Favorite Web Sites

Political Republican Offers:

Make Real Money
Taking Pictures

Political Republican Opinion book - Income From Photography

If you enjoy taking photos, then starting a photography business will be easy and achievable for you. Learn how to earn up to $720 part time, per week form this guide ... Guaranteed!

Start doing what you love! Just $37.83 gets you the most popular photography business guide on the internet.

Click Here To Get
Income From Photography
Today!

 

Unlimited Wii Downloads

Political Republican Opinion - Wii image

Access the fastest and largest Wii downloads database on the Internet. Members have access to Unlimited Wii Games, Movies, TV Shows, Software and More!

No monthly fees or per-download charges. A one-time fee of $49.95 gets you access for life to the most up-to-date Wii games!

Click Here to Get Started Now!

 

Free Internet Money-Making
Training Seminar

Political Republican Opinion - Free Internet Training

Wealth Training By The Master

Russell Brunson is going to personally train you to make money online for free, and he wants everyone to make a collective $100 Million Dollars! Best part? Proceeds from the contest go to World Teacher Aid.

Click Here to get the details and Start Making Money Now!

 

Stock Trading
On Autopilot

Political Republican Opinion - Stock Trading Software

Make Money While You Sleep!

This amazing piece of software allows individuals to leave their computer on autopilot, as it makes real time decisions based upon market conditions. Whether you are experienced in FOREX trading or a complete novice, Forex Autopilot does the work for you, leveling the playing field for all.

The introductory rate of $99.00 for this amazing software won't last forever, so Click Here to get your copy today!

 

Don't Tread On Me Flag

Don't let government take your voice, America. Fly the Don't Tread On Me flag.

Click Here To Get Yours Today!

 

Pages

  • 30May

    Political Republican Opinion Guest Writer: Slater Bakhtavar

    Author Bio: Slater Bakhtavar is president and founder of Republican Youth of America, a frequent commentator and respected analyst on foreign policy issues, an attorney with a post-doctoral degree in International law, General Counsel of a national corporation and Attorney at Bakhtavar & Associates, PLLC.

    Political Republican Image - Ahmadinejad “I did not know it then – perhaps I did not want to know – but it is clear to me now that the Americans wanted me out. Clearly this is what the human rights advocates in the State Department wanted … What was I to make of the Administration’s sudden decision to call former Under Secretary of State George Ball to the White House as an adviser on Iran? Ball was among those Americans who wanted to abandon me and ultimately my country.” – Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, The Shah of Iran

    These were the words uttered by the distraught Shah of Iran when, grieving, he reflected on his downfall just before his demise in exile. The tormented former “King of Kings” ardently nurtured a deep-rooted conviction that the Carter Administration, in cooperation with the British Secret Intelligence, ordered and ensured his fall.

    During World War II, England and the Soviet Union jointly invaded Iran, dividing the nation into two zones of occupation as the English and Russians had previously done in 1907. In the North, the Soviets secured a viable supply route and in the south the British placed their oil interests under their direct protection. Reza Shah, father of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, and the Nation of Iran were humiliated by the subjugation of Iran’s domestic and foreign affairs to their conduct by foreign powers. King Reza Shah, who had implemented numerous progressive social and economic reforms, was ousted by British and Soviet forces and replaced by Mohammad Reza Shah, his twenty-year-old, inexperienced son. The British and Soviets, wielding little sympathy for the mass populace, occupied Iran.

    In the North, the Soviets promptly and forcefully revived Iran’s Communist Party with the objective of undermining the royal regime and installing a centralized Communist government. With Soviet assistance, the Tudeh party constituted itself as a pro-Soviet Communist party with its central management in Soviet Union. Meanwhile in the South, the British set monarchists against religious fundamentalists, fundamentalists against nationalists, nationalists against monarchists, faction against faction, and tribe against tribe with a “divide and conquer” agenda. Accordingly, Iran sank into social disorder, political disarray and economic hardship. Under foreign domination by both the Communists and the British, the Iranian people welcomed an increasing role of the United States. By 1946, the Iranian government crushed the pro-Soviet Tudeh party that had been infiltrating the nation and threatening to divide Iran.

    Increasingly, Iran became dependent on the United States as a counterinfluence to the Soviets and British. As early as December 1954 the Shah noted, “the potentialities of friendly and close relations between the people of Iran and the United States are immense. There is a deep and fundamental identity of national interests which overshadows everything else. We both believe that the individual is the central figure in society, and that freedom is the supreme blessing. . . Iran has a great deal in common, in convictions with the Western world regarding freedom and democracy.”

    He branded his regime’s politics as “positive nationalism”.

    In January 1963, the Shah announced democratic reforms as part of a six-point program called the White Revolution, a program of reforms to divide landholdings such as those owned by religious foundations, grant women the right to vote and equality in marriage, and allow religious minorities a greater share in governmental offices. Ruhollah Ayatollah Khomeini led a movement among radical fundamentalists to oppose equal rights for women and minorities and the reform policies of the Shah. On January 22, 1963, Khomeini dictated a vigorously worded declaration denouncing the Westernization of Iran and economic reforms and human rights as anti-Islamic. However, the Shah did not per se attempt to “Westernize Iran.” Iran was since its inception a Monarchy. Instead the Shah sought a pro-Western policy to counter the Communist Soviet Union. Iran’s socio-economic and foreign policy objectives were closely tied to the capitalist world, in direct conflict with the communist ideology of Soviet Union and fundamentalism of surrounding nations.

    In contrast, the Iranian fundamentalists sought to eradicate pre-600 A.D. Iranian culture and history and supersede it with an exclusive focus on post-600 A.D. This is in line with Khomeini’s decrees, such as one issued on March 21, 1963 in which he declared that Persian New Year (“Norooz”) celebrations be cancelled and that references to pre-Islamic Iran be eliminated. In 1964 Khomeini was arrested and exiled to Turkey. On September 5, 1965 he left Turkey for Najaf, Iraq, where he spent 13 years as an exile out of touch with the Iranian people and culture. On October 3, 1978 he left Iraq for Kuwait, but was refused entry at the border. After a period of hesitation in which Algeria, Lebanon and Syria were considered as possible destinations, Ayatollah Khomeini embarked for Paris. Once arrived in Paris, Khomeini took up residence in the suburb of Neauphle-le-Chateau in a house that had been rented for him by Iranian exiles in France. Subsequently, journalists from across the world visited the cleric, and the image and the words of Ayatollah Khomeini soon became a daily feature in Iran and across the world. The BBC and other agencies broadcast nightly interviews with Khomeini beamed into Iran, which incited the people against the Shah.

    In November 1978 then President Carter nominated George Ball as a member of the Trilateral Commission. The commission acted under the direct control of the National Security Council’s Zbigniew Brzezinski, an ardent opponent of the Shah of Iran. This commission cultivated a clandestine Iran task force. While serving on this commission, George Ball championed cessation of United States support for the Shah and clandestine support for Rubhullah Ayatollah Khomeini who, albeit in exile, led a proletariat Islamic opposition. Pursuant to this agenda George Ball sought to garner the support of Robert Bowie, who was at that time the Deputy Director of the United States Central Intelligence Agency.

    Meanwhile, Iran and British Petroleum commenced negotiations in Tehran, Iran concerning the renewal of a twenty-five-year-old extraction agreement. These talks collapsed because the British demanded exclusive rights in Iran’s future oil output and refused to guarantee purchase of the commodity. The disintegration of the these negotiations was domestically branded as a step towards nationalization of Iran’s oil for the first time since 1953. Subsequently, the Shah turned to prospective buyers in Germany, France, Japan and elsewhere. The Shah had increased Iran’s control over its oil resources, implemented progressive economic and social initiatives, undertook speedy process of capitalist reforms that focused on industrialization, increased Iran’s military capabilities and sought to build a strong, prosperous and independent Iran; however, his goals and policies became the basis for his eventual downfall.

    In mid-January 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini returned and the monarchy collapsed on February 11, 1979. Subsequently, Iranians, many of whom believed in Ayatollah Khomeini’s promises of freedom and democracy, voted by a national referendum to become an Islamic Republic on April 1, 1979. They also approved a new constitution, and Khomeini became Supreme Leader of Iran. But Khomeini did not fulfill his pre-revolution promises to the people of Iran. Instead, he started to marginalize and crush the opposition groups and those who opposed the clerical rules. He ordered establishment of many institutions to consolidate power and safeguard the cleric leadership. During his early years in power he launched the Cultural Revolution in order to Islamize the whole country. Many people lost employment, and books were revised or burnt according to the new Islamic values. A newly established Islamic judicial system sentenced many Iranians to death and long-term imprisonment, as they were in opposition to those radical changes. The current regime continues many of the policies of the regime of the now-deceased Ayatollah Khomeini, including revising and eradicating Iranian history, culture and identity.

    Perhaps the revolution and subsequent consequences would have never occurred if the Carter Administration had not taken the helm. No doubt, neither President Richard M. Nixon or President Ronald Reagan would have paved the way for the arrival of the current theocracy. Criticizing the Carter Administration’s handling of the crises in Iran, President Reagan said “I did criticize the President because of his undermining of our stalwart ally, the Shah, I do not believe that he was that far out of line with his people.” Former United States President Richard Nixon was the sole United States representative to attend the Shah’s funeral in Egypt.

    To the present, many Iranians believe that the Carter Administration and the British intervened in 1979 and paved the path for the Shah’s demise. Sympathetic remarks about the revolution by high-level Democratic American officials, such as Bill Clinton, who dubbed Iran a “democracy”, and several former members of the Carter Administration, indicate the pretentious attitude of these officials. These officials should be reminded that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, erroneously labeled by foreign journalists as the “Leader of Iran”, exerts minimal control in Iran. Rather, pursuant to the Iranian Constitution virtually absolute power is in the unelected “Supreme Leader” Ayatollah Khamenei.

    Iran is an absolute theocracy and lacks the basic foundations of even a limited form of democracy. Perhaps, if the Carter Administration had not undermined the Shah of Iran, the regime itself would have implemented the proper foundations for a modern democratic republic or constitutional monarchy. Modern Iran could have been an “island of stability” in the Middle East. Without the Carter Administration’s misguided foreign policy initiatives, Iran, similar to Japan, Denmark, Spain or England, could today be a close U.S. ally with a hereditary monarch and a democratically elected President or Prime Minister.

    The Political Republican Opinion Blog would like to thank Slater Bakhtavar for his submission and welcomes any other writers to send in their Conservative articles via the Contact Us  page.

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “’Theocracy’ has always been the synonym for a bleak and narrow, if not a fierce and blood-stained tyranny” - William Archer

    Technorati Tags: , , , ,

    Tags: , , , ,

  • 21Apr

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Burger King AdI just watched a piece on Fox & Friends about the “outrage” some people are expressing over a recent Burger King advertisement that features Burger King’s “King” singing a remix of Sir Mix-A-Lot’s song, “Baby Got Back” with the new lyrics, “I like square butts and I cannot lie.” Specifically, The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC) has launched a letter-writing campaign demanding that Nickelodeon and Burger King immediately pull the new, “highly sexualized” television ad for BK’s 99-cent SpongeBob Kids Meal.

    The offensive content, according to the CCFC, includes The King singing in front of women who are shaking their behinds in front of the camera intercut with SpongeBob dancing along on a TV screen, the King measuring a woman’s posterior after she’s stuffed a telephone book under her clothes to achieve a square profile and Sir Mix-A-Lot sitting on a couch with two women, proclaiming, “booty is booty.”

    Horrors!!!

    A spokesman for Burger King pointed out that the commercial only runs during adult-oriented shows such as “Sex in the City.”  The chain has developed a second, “completely different” SpongeBob advertising campaign for children that’s currently airing on kid-targeted programming, BK adds.

    It’s time for this country to get off of this politically correct movement and to take a reality pill. If this is the worst thing that your child is exposed to during the course of a day, consider yourself lucky. Your children are far more likely to see real people walking around showing more “booty,” cleavage and comporting themselves in sexually explicit ways during the course of any given day. If you want to limit their exposure to this “offensive” commercial content, might I suggest changing the channel? Or, how about living in a cave?

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day:

    “Up to a point a man’s life is shaped by environment, heredity, and the movements and changes in the world around him. Then there comes a time when it lies within his grasp to shape the clay of his life into the sort of thing he wishes to be. Only the weak blame parents, their race, their times, lack of good fortune, or the quirks of fate. Everyone has it within his power to say, ‘This I am today; that I will be tomorrow.’ The wish, however, must be implemented by deeds.”

    Louis L’Amour - The Walking Drum

    Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , ,

  • 25Jan

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - President Barack Obama on the Civil Rights Issue A little after midnight on November 4th, 2008, just after watching John McCain’s concession speech proclaiming Barack Obama the next President of the United States of America, I began writing a post. In the post, I congratulated Barack Obama and said that I would do as any American should do and support him to the best of my ability as my country’s President.

    As I stated then, this doesn’t mean that I will forgo my right to criticize him when he does things that I don’t agree with. His political stances as outlined on his pre-election website as well as his past actions have me convinced that we will not see eye-to-eye on an issue or two (okay, maybe two dozen). I will, however, conduct myself in a civil manner when I disagree with the policies of our new President. It’s too bad that the Left was not able to comport themselves with the same civility during George Bush’s tenure.

    I also made another promise that night. I told my loyal readers that I had taken the liberty to copy Barack Obama’s pre-election website in its entirety and that I would post the contents of that site, issue-by-issue, in the future. I did this so that I would be able to publish his promises as they were made during the election season and follow his progress toward the goals that he had set before becoming President of the greatest country on earth.

    Those of you who took the time to actually read through his entire site as I did on numerous occasions know that there were frequent changes made to it by the Obama staffers in the months leading up to the election. Not that I don’t trust the guy, but I thought it might be best to preserve those pre-election promises before they were, shall we say, “amended.”

    This is the first in a rather long series of posts that will summarize Obama’s positions as stated at the time on barackobama.com. The first issue we will tackle is …The Civil Rights Issue:

    Pay Discrimination: Barack Obama stated on his website that one of his goals as President would be to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision regarding the ability of women and minorities to challenge pay discrimination. He also promised to pass the “Fair Pay Act,” which would require businesses to pay women equal pay for equal work.

    First of all, I’d like to point out that the President does not pass laws – that was Barack Obama’s job to do during the two whole years that he spent as a Senator before deciding that it would be more fun to run for President.

    Secondly, I wonder how many years the Senate and House will bicker back and forth as they try to decide the exact parameters involved in defining “equal work?” Will it simply be the number of hours one puts in? Will it have quantifiable parameters such as “x number of widgets produced” in a given time span? Or, will it be more subjective? How will the government define an employer’s role in determining if one employee provides better quality of work than another? (I’m not even going to get into the “Who will move the 50 pound box?” thing.)

    Hmmm … I have yet to meet any two people in a company that I have worked for – regardless of race or gender - that provided the same exact amount and quality of work. With that in mind, I would think that the “Fair Pay Act” has a good chance of becoming a rather ambiguous piece of legislature. But, then again, what am I thinking? With the government involved, I’m sure this will be far less complicated!

    The “Employment Non-Discrimination Act”: Barack Obama also promised to pass the “Employment Non-Discrimination Act” when he became President. This Act would prevent discrimination based upon sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression.

    We’ll pretend, once again, that Presidents can pass laws here. Since employers were not specifically mentioned on the site, does this mean that a woman will no longer be able to choose to have a female gynecologist versus a male one? Does it mean that the George Castanzas of the world may end up having to accept a male as their masseuse, which may lead to them questioning their own sexual orientation (“I think it moved!”)?

    I live in Orlando, so this piece of legislature may have no affect on me at all. I mean really … could anyone tell the difference between Minnie Mouse and a cross-dressing Mickey?

    Strengthen Federal Hate Crimes Legislation: Barack Obama continues in his role of being the only President permitted to pass laws by stating that he will pass the “Matthew Shepard Act.” That law would expand the current hate crimes law to included crimes that are motivated by a person’s actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability.

    Obviously, no person should have crimes committed against them for any reason whatsoever. I’ve never been real clear as to why a crime needs to be further classified as a “hate crime” and why it should have different sentencing than a plain old “I really dislike you” crime. Aren’t most assaults and murders “hate crimes?”

    Other than that, the only provisions of the bill that I have a bit of a problem with is the part that gives federal authorities a “greater ability to engage in hate crimes investigations that local authorities choose not to pursue” and the part where $10 million in federal taxpayer dollars are to be provided to state and local agencies to help pay for prosecuting these crimes. After all, I believe in a smaller federal government in terms of its size and role, not a larger one.

    Voter Fraud: Barack Obama states on his site that he will sign into law harsher penalties for voter fraud. Assuming that Congress passes such a law that he can sign, what will this law entail?

    Since the mainstream Liberal media completely ignored the blatant voter manipulations of Barack Obama’s favorite “community organizing” group, Acorn, does this mean the harsher penalty will be that the media needs to mention this type of fraud at least once or twice during future elections?

    Does it mean that someone from Acorn could actually go to jail?

    Or, does it simply mean that only 99% of fraudulent voter registrations will be permitted instead of 100%?

    Would Al Franken still win the Minnesota State Senate seat under this “harsher” Obama law?

    Ban Photo ID Requirements for Voting: I kid you not; one sentence after promising harsher penalties for voter fraud, Barack Obama states that he wants to ban the requirement for people to prove who they actually are. You can tell from this statement that he is really serious about the voter fraud issue!

    Racial Profiling: Barack Obama states that he will ban profiling by federal law enforcement agencies and provide “incentives” for state and local police departments to do the same. No elaboration is provided, outlining what those incentives will be, however.

    Of course this is technically a great goal; we should all be treated equally. Unfortunately, human nature takes over in many cases and there will be profiling at least on a subconscious level for many decades to come.

    It should also be pointed out that without some degree of profiling, many of the thwarted terrorist plots against this and other countries since 9-11 may very well have not occurred.

    Cocaine: Barack Obama says he wants to make sentencing penalties the same for crack cocaine as powdered cocaine. The legal system, he says, has harsher penalties for users and dealers of the much more addictive crack cocaine than the powdered variety. He claims that it is racist to separate the two, since more blacks use crack cocaine versus the powdered variety than do whites.

    Maybe a simpler fix to this “problem” would be to educate the African American community that they would be far better off using the powdered variety or, here’s a novel idea, how about not using it at all?

    Or, maybe President Obama should advocate a campaign that promotes the use of crack cocaine amongst whites to even things out. They could run Public Service Announcements during NASCAR events or maybe during televised PBA and PGA programs!

    My question is, since Barack Obama is a biracial individual, what form of the drug did he use during his admitted experimentation with cocaine? Was he forced to try both out of split racial allegiances?

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “History is not going to be kind to liberals. With their mindless programs, they’ve managed to do to Black Americans what slavery, Reconstruction, and rank racism found impossible: destroy their family and work ethic.” – Walter Williams

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • 21Jan

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Mankey Business in Washington My sister sent the following story to me. Without the permission of the anonymous author, I provide it to you, as well …

    Once upon a time, a man appeared in a village and announced to the residents that he would buy monkeys for $10 each. The villagers, knowing the forest was chock-full of monkeys, went into the woods and began snatching them up.

    The man bought tens of thousands of monkeys from them at the agreed upon $10 price but, as the supply started to diminish and it became more difficult to catch the monkeys, the villagers lost interest. Seeing this, the man decided to up his price to $50 per monkey.

    With increased vigor, the villagers set out anew, collecting monkeys and selling them to the man for $50. Tens of thousands of monkeys were sold to the man at the new, higher price but, once again, as the supply of monkeys grew even smaller, the villagers gave up and went back to their farm chores.

    The man raised the price yet again to $100, which caused a renewed effort to catch every monkey the eye could see. Monkeys became so scarce, it was virtually impossible to find a monkey, let alone catch one!

    The man gathered all of the villagers together and told them he had to go to the city on business. While he was away, he would leave his assistant in charge and raise his per monkey price to a whopping $500!

    After the man had departed, the assistant looked at the thousands upon thousands of cages of monkeys. He told the villagers that he would make a deal with them. He would sell them the monkeys that had already been caught for only $100 and, when his boss returned, they could sell him the monkeys for $500 and they could all turn a tidy profit.

    The villagers rounded up all of their savings and greedily handed it over to the assistant in exchange for the bargain-priced monkeys, at a gross sum of 800 billion dollars …..

    ….. They never saw the man or his assistant again but, instead, only lots and lots of monkeys.

    …..

    Maybe now you have a little better understanding of how our government bailout system works!

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.” - H.L. Menken

    Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , ,

  • 06Jan

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Throwing Money Around With only 17 days to go before the inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama, Democrats are already rubbing their hands together, eager to get their hands on as much money as they can from what will surely be one of the most irresponsible spending sprees in our nation’s history.

    An article that recently appeared in Reuters reports that five governors – all Democrats - have banded together, asking the federal government for a $1 trillion bailout. That money would only help struggling states remain above water until the beginning of 2010, however. They are crossing their fingers and hoping for an economic recovery by the end of the year or else they’ll be lining up, asking for more next year. How’s that for a sound fiscal plan?

    Democratic Governor Jim Doyle of Wisconsin said, “quite a number” of other governors are supporting the trillion dollar initiative, adding, “the Obama team has been very receptive to listening to us.”

    Banks, insurance companies, automobile manufacturers and now state governments are all lining up, hoping to cash in. Hey, as long as we are unconcerned about having future generations pay for fixing our current economic woes, why not do the most sensible thing of all during this mad spending spree? That is, give the money to the people!

    According to the Boston Globe and CNN.com, the federal government is now willing to spend as much as $7 trillion to rescue the economy. That’s $23,000 per American or $60,000 per household. Just imagine what the effect on the economy would be if each family were to receive a nice, fat $60,000 check from the government.

    Families facing severe debt would be able to get themselves back on the right track. If families were able to pay off their debts, the banks wouldn’t need a bailout. $60,000 would also make a nice little down payment. This would have to be pretty good news for the housing and construction industries. Retailers would be raking in the dough, auto makers would no longer need a bailout and manufacturing of all sorts would shoot through the roof. All of this extra business activity would mean an explosion in the number of jobs created and, with that many more people employed, still more spending would occur.

    Of course, this more sensible redistribution of money would never happen under a Democratic plan. If people were able to succeed and the economy was able to right itself in this manner, what would we need all of the excess government for? If there weren’t unfortunate people, the Democratic Party’s base would erode to nothing. Sure, there would always be the handful of tree huggers, animal rights advocates and global warming alarmists to go after. Hardly enough of a voting block to sustain a political party, though.

    No, the five Democratic Governors have it right if their goal is to sustain and increase the size of the Democratic Party’s base. Create a larger government to oversee massive new projects, take government control of more and more private business entities and give the people just enough money to make it look like they are fighting for them but don’t give them enough to break their dependence on the Party.

    Or, we could let the natural process of a Capitalist market correct itself as it has done time and time again. If not, I like my plan better. I don’t have any children and don’t ever plan to, so I am more inclined to take the $60,000 and let your children worry about paying it back!

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: Ancient Rome declined because it had a Senate, now what’s going to happen to us with both a House and a Senate?” – Will Rogers

    Technorati Tags: , , , ,

    Tags: , , , ,

  • 05Dec

    Wh is Barack Obama? Although the subject came up here and there during the presidential race, it was largely dismissed by the media and The Political Republican Opinion blog as a far-fetched desperation play by Obama haters. I mean, I didn’t want the guy elected any more than the next Republican, but I was hardly willing to start grasping at straws.

    Lately, however, there has been a growing movement to prove that Barack Obama is not a citizen. I have ignored it for the most part as a ludicrous idea promoted by a bunch of wishful thinkers; but, the more the furor builds, the more I begin to wonder myself, “what is this guy hiding?”

    During the election, I briefly mentioned Andy Martin’s “Operation Aloha Obama” investigation in a post titled, “Marxist? … Socialist? … Who Is Barack Obama? Martin’s in-depth investigation pointed out the road blocks that were put up all over our southernmost state in an attempt to hide the President-elect’s true identity (which, according to Martin, is “Frank Marshall Davis Jr.”).

    Then there was the article by Stanley Kurtz, showing how the University of Illinois locked up access to the Annenberg Challenge documents that Barack Obama and William Ayers worked on together.

    How about the fact that no papers from Barack Obama’s college years have been revealed or the fact that Obama wouldn’t release his medical records?

    Quite a disturbing pattern, I must say!

    Because the mainstream Liberal media is doing what it has always done – completely ignoring anything that casts a shadow on Barack Obama – the Obama camp has been able to be dismissive. They will continue to hide the secrets about the man until there is public pressure to reveal them. Even then, he has already assembled a team of law firms (no, not lawyers … we’re talking entire firms here) to combat any attempts at getting information about his past revealed.

    Maybe there really is something to the whole Obama missing birth certificate thing. If he really has nothing to hide, why wouldn’t he put everything out there for the public record? Then again, I recall the same things being said not too long ago about Roger Clemmons and Barry Bonds – we all know how that turned out!

    The common sense side of me reasons that we couldn’t possibly have elected a man who is constitutionally forbidden from holding the office of President. My “something smells fishy here” side, however, believes there very well may be something rotten in Denmark!

    The Russian online newspaper Pravda is beginning to think that Americans fell prey to the biggest con-job in US history when they gave unprecedented millions to support a man who may not be eligible to be our President. You can read about it here: While MSM Continues To Suppress Story, Pravda Runs Editorial Laughing At U.S. For Not Verifying If Obama Is A Citizen.

    Non Sequitur Alert!: I would like to apologize to my loyal readers for my recent lack of posts to The Political Republican Opinion Blog. I’ve been working on a new blog, Find a Wii. It is a silly blog about my triumphs and travesties related to the Wii entertainment system. Sometimes, it’s nice to not take things so seriously

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “Hope is the only universal liar who never loses his reputation for veracity.” - Thomas Fuller

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    Tags: , ,

  • 27Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Thanksgiving My, how times have changed. All one needs to do is look at the history of the Thanksgiving holiday to see how twisted things have become here in the good ole’ USA.

    As we celebrate the Thanksgiving holiday, it is important to think about what the holiday really means. Our public education system offers one point of view, our churches and past government another and the writings of an early Pilgrim leader teaches an all-together different lesson.

    I apologize in advance for the length of this post, knowing many won’t have the time, patience or inclination to read it all the way through. To those that do take the time, I hope that it changes the way that you think of this day of Thanksgiving in terms of political, religious and historical perspectives. To those who don’t, I’m sorry I could not consolidate the following information into the bite-sized portions that many have grown accustomed to for their “knowledge” of important facts.

    Thanksgiving In The Public School System

    The following is from a public school board in Seattle Washington and provides an excellent example of the way that our public school system is now teaching the story of Thanksgiving:

    HIGHLINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

    EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES and ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
    15675 Ambaum Boulevard S.W. Telephone 206/433-0111
    Seattle, Washington 98166

    November 13, 1985

    Dear Colleague:

    As educators, we continually strive to improve the clarity and accuracy of what is taught about the history of our country. Too often, we have presented what is considered to be a traditional mono-cultural perspective of history to our students. Our celebrations and observances have borne this out. We are, however, becoming increasingly aware of the need for greater cultural accuracy in historical studies. This is consistent with the State Superintendent of Public Instruction’s commitment to multi-cultural education for all students.

    With this in mind, the Highline Indian Education program designed these instructional materials last year to be used in teaching about Thanksgiving in grades K-6. The response to these materials has been very positive and we are happy to have the opportunity to share them with districts in the state. We trust that you will find them to be a valuable addition to your instructional resources.

    - Dr. Kent Matheson
    Superintendent

    - Dr. Bill McCleary
    Assistant Superintendent, Curriculum and Instruction

    The Thanksgiving holiday season is a time when Indian history and culture are frequently discussed in the schools. Unfortunately, the information and materials available to teachers are often incomplete or stereotyped in their presentation. For example, some commercially-produced bulletin board posters depict Plains-style Indians with feather warbonnets, tipis in the background, and horses tied nearby, sitting down to dinner with the Pilgrims. While these images are popular, they do not accurately represent the unique culture of the New England tribes, whose lifestyle was quite different than that of the Plains Indian stereotype. In addition, some books make brief mention of the critical assistance given by the Indians to the Pilgrims and tend to leave readers with the mistaken impression that all participants at the Thanksgiving feast remained friends for many years to come.

    This unit provides additional information about the Indians of the North-east culture area where the first Thanksgiving took place. It includes art projects and other activities teachers can use for expanding and enriching their instruction. It is hoped that these materials will enable teachers to better portray the events surrounding the first Thanksgiving.

    - Cathy Ross, Mary Robertson and Roger Fernandes

    THE PLYMOUTH THANKSGIVING STORY

    When the Pilgrims crossed the Atlantic Ocean in 1620, they landed on the rocky shores of a territory that was inhabited by the Wampanoag (Wam pa NO ag) Indians. The Wampanoags were part of the Algonkian-speaking peoples, a large group that was part of the Woodland Culture area.

    These Indians lived in villages along the coast of what is now Massachusetts and Rhode Island. They lived in round-roofed houses called wigwams. These were made of poles covered with flat sheets of elm or birch bark. Wigwams differ in construction from tipis that were used by Indians of the Great Plains.

    The Wampanoags moved several times during each year in order to get food. In the spring they would fish in the rivers for salmon and herring. In the planting season they moved to the forest to hunt deer and other animals. After the end of the hunting season people moved inland where there was greater protection from the weather. From December to April they lived on food that they stored during the earlier months.

    The basic dress for men was the breech clout, a length of deerskin looped over a belt in back and in front. Women wore deerskin wrap-around skirts. Deerskin leggings and fur capes made from deer, beaver, otter, and bear skins gave protection during the colder seasons, and deerskin moccasins were worn on the feet. Both men and women usually braided their hair and a single feather was often worn in the back of the hair by men. They did not have the large feathered headdresses worn by people in the Plains Culture area.

    There were two language groups of Indians in New England at this time. The Iroquois were neighbors to the Algonkian-speaking people. Leaders of the Algonquin and Iroquois people were called “sachems” (SAY chems. Each village had its own sachem and tribal council. Political power flowed upward from the people. Any individual, man or woman, could participate, but among the Algonquins more political power was held by men. Among the Iroquois, however, women held the deciding vote in the final selection of who would represent the group. Both men and women enforced the laws of the village and helped solve problems. The details of their democratic system were so impressive that about 150 years later Benjamin Franklin invited the Iroquois to Albany, New York, to explain their system to a delegation who then developed the “Albany Plan of Union.” This document later served as a model for the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States.

    These Indians of the Eastern Woodlands called the turtle, the deer and the fish their brothers. They respected the forest and everything in it as equals. Whenever a hunter made a kill, he was careful to leave behind some bones or meat as a spiritual offering, to help other animals survive. Not to do so would be considered greedy. The Wampanoags also treated each other with respect. Any visitor to a Wampanoag home was provided with a share of whatever food the family had, even if the supply was low. This same courtesy was extended to the Pilgrims when they met.

    We can only guess what the Wampanoags must have thought when they first saw the strange ships of the Pilgrims arriving on their shores. But their custom was to help visitors, and they treated the newcomers with courtesy. It was mainly because of their kindness that the Pilgrims survived at all. The wheat the Pilgrims had brought with them to plant would not grow in the rocky soil. They needed to learn new ways for a new world, and the man who came to help them was called “Tisquantum” (Tis SKWAN tum) or “Squanto” (SKWAN toe).

    Squanto was originally from the village of Patuxet (Pa TUK et) and a member of the Pokanokit Wampanoag nation. Patuxet once stood on the exact site where the Pilgrims built Plymouth. In 1605, fifteen years before the Pilgrims came, Squanto went to England with a friendly English explorer named John Weymouth. He had many adventures and learned to speak English. Squanto came back to New England with Captain Weymouth. Later Squanto was captured by a British slaver who raided the village and sold Squanto to the Spanish in the Caribbean Islands. A Spanish Franciscan priest befriended Squanto and helped him to get to Spain and later on a ship to England. Squanto then found Captain Weymouth, who paid his way back to his homeland. In England Squanto met Samoset of the Wabanake (Wab NAH key) Tribe, who had also left his native home with an English explorer. They both returned together to Patuxet in 1620. When they arrived, the village was deserted and there were skeletons everywhere. Everyone in the village had died from an illness the English slavers had left behind. Squanto and Samoset went to stay with a neighboring village of Wampanoags.

    One year later, in the spring, Squanto and Samoset were hunting along the beach near Patuxet. They were startled to see people from England in their deserted village. For several days, they stayed nearby observing the newcomers. Finally they decided to approach them. Samoset walked into the village and said “welcome,” Squanto soon joined him. The Pilgrims were very surprised to meet two Indians who spoke English.

    The Pilgrims were not in good condition. They were living in dirt-covered shelters, there was a shortage of food, and nearly half of them had died during the winter. They obviously needed help and the two men were a welcome sight. Squanto, who probably knew more English than any other Indian in North America at that time, decided to stay with the Pilgrims for the next few months and teach them how to survive in this new place. He brought them deer meat and beaver skins. He taught them how to cultivate corn and other new vegetables and how to build Indian-style houses. He pointed out poisonous plants and showed how other plants could be used as medicine. He explained how to dig and cook clams, how to get sap from the maple trees, use fish for fertilizer, and dozens of other skills needed for their survival.

    By the time fall arrived things were going much better for the Pilgrims, thanks to the help they had received. The corn they planted had grown well. There was enough food to last the winter. They were living comfortably in their Indian-style wigwams and had also managed to build one European-style building out of squared logs. This was their church. They were now in better health, and they knew more about surviving in this new land. The Pilgrims decided to have a thanksgiving feast to celebrate their good fortune. They had observed thanksgiving feasts in November as religious obligations in England for many years before coming to the New World.

    The Algonkian tribes held six thanksgiving festivals during the year. The beginning of the Algonkian year was marked by the Maple Dance which gave thanks to the Creator for the maple tree and its syrup. This ceremony occurred when the weather was warm enough for the sap to run in the maple trees, sometimes as early as February. Second was the planting feast, where the seeds were blessed. The strawberry festival was next, celebrating the first fruits of the season. Summer brought the green corn festival to give thanks for the ripening corn. In late fall, the harvest festival gave thanks for the food they had grown.

    Mid-winter was the last ceremony of the old year. When the Indians sat down to the “first Thanksgiving” with the Pilgrims, it was really the fifth thanksgiving of the year for them! Captain Miles Standish, the leader of the Pilgrims, invited Squanto, Samoset, Massasoit (the leader of the Wampanoags), and their immediate families to join them for a celebration, but they had no idea how big Indian families could be. As the Thanksgiving feast began, the Pilgrims were overwhelmed at the large turnout of ninety relatives that Squanto and Samoset brought with them. The Pilgrims were not prepared to feed a gathering of people that large for three days. Seeing this, Massasoit gave orders to his men within the first hour of his arrival to go home and get more food. Thus it happened that the Indians supplied the majority of the food: Five deer, many wild turkeys, fish, beans, squash, corn soup, corn bread, and berries. Captain Standish sat at one end of a long table and the Clan Chief Massasoit sat at the other end. For the first time the Wampanoag people were sitting at a table to eat instead of on mats or furs spread on the ground. The Indian women sat together with the Indian men to eat. The Pilgrim women, however, stood quietly behind the table and waited until after their men had eaten, since that was their custom.

    For three days the Wampanoags feasted with the Pilgrims. It was a special time of friendship between two very different groups of people. A peace and friendship agreement was made between Massasoit and Miles Standish giving the Pilgrims the clearing in the forest where the old Patuxet village once stood to build their new town of Plymouth.

    It would be very good to say that this friendship lasted a long time; but, unfortunately, that was not to be. More English people came to America, and they were not in need of help from the Indians as were the original Pilgrims. Many of the newcomers forgot the help the Indians had given them. Mistrust started to grow and the friendship weakened. The Pilgrims started telling their Indian neighbors that their Indian religion and Indian customs were wrong. The Pilgrims displayed an intolerance toward the Indian religion similar to the intolerance displayed toward the less popular religions in Europe. The relationship deteriorated and within a few years the children of the people who ate together at the first Thanksgiving were killing one another in what came to be called King Phillip’s War.

    It is sad to think that this happened, but it is important to understand all of the story and not just the happy part. Today the town of Plymouth Rock has a Thanksgiving ceremony each year in remembrance of the first Thanksgiving. There are still Wampanoag people living in Massachusetts. In 1970, they asked one of them to speak at the ceremony to mark the 350th anniversary of the Pilgrim’s arrival. Here is part of what was said:

    “Today is a time of celebrating for you — a time of looking back to the first days of white people in America. But it is not a time of celebrating for me. It is with a heavy heart that I look back upon what happened to my People. When the Pilgrims arrived, we, the Wampanoags, welcomed them with open arms, little knowing that it was the beginning of the end. That before 50 years were to pass, the Wampanoag would no longer be a tribe. That we and other Indians living near the settlers would be killed by their guns or dead from diseases that we caught from them. Let us always remember, the Indian is and was just as human as the white people.

    Although our way of life is almost gone, we, the Wampanoags, still walk the lands of Massachusetts. What has happened cannot be changed. But today we work toward a better America, a more Indian America where people and nature once again are important.”

    In summary, the story of Thanksgiving as taught in our public schools teaches us that:

    • Pilgrims were thankful for their good fortune, not the blessings afforded them by God.
    • The Indian people are the only reason that the Pilgrims survived.
    • The Pilgrims slaughtered the indians in return for their kindness.
    • Pilgrim Women were subservient to men; Indian women were treated as equals.
    • Nature and the environment must be protected.

    God & Thanksgiving According To Our Government

    Thanksgiving is now celebrated annually in the United States on the fourth Thursday in November. Many people mistakenly think that it was President Franklin D. Roosevelt that declared the first official Thanksgiving holiday. Although he certainly set the precedent for the official day that Thanksgiving has been celebrated in this country since 1939 (an Act of Congress in 1941 made it official), the US government had previously set aside a day of Thanksgiving on numerous occasions in this country’s history.

    As the Liberal movement in this country chips away year after year at the morals our nation was founded on and attempts to re-write the Constitution of the United States of America by misconstruing the intent of its authors to recognize the teachings of God, it is important to read the words that were used by our past Presidents (beginning with the first, George Washington) and our Congress. It is important to note how God was the focal point of our Thanksgiving holiday in their eyes:

    The Continental Congress – 1777:

    General George Washington, leader of the revolutionary forces in the American Revolutionary War, proclaimed a day of Thanksgiving in December of 1777 as a celebration of the defeat of British troops at Saratoga. At the same time, the first national proclamation of Thanksgiving was given by the colonial government, the Continental Congress. In December of 1777 they wrote:

    “FOR AS MUCH as it is the indispensable Duty of all Men to adore the superintending Providence of Almighty God; to acknowledge with Gratitude their Obligation to him for Benefits received, and to implore such farther Blessings as they stand in Need of: And it having pleased him in his abundant Mercy, not only to continue to us the innumerable Bounties of his common Providence; but also to smile upon us in the Prosecution of a just and necessary War, for the Defense and Establishment of our unalienable Rights and Liberties; particularly in that he hath been pleased, in so great a Measure, to prosper the Means used for the Support of our Troops, and to crown our Arms with most signal success:

    It is therefore recommended to the legislative or executive Powers of these UNITED STATES to set apart THURSDAY, the eighteenth Day of December next, for SOLEMN THANKSGIVING and PRAISE: That at one Time and with one Voice, the good People may express the grateful Feelings of their Hearts, and consecrate themselves to the Service of their Divine Benefactor; and that, together with their sincere Acknowledgments and Offerings, they may join the penitent Confession of their manifold Sins, whereby they had forfeited every Favor; and their humble and earnest Supplication that it may please GOD through the Merits of JESUS CHRIST, mercifully to forgive and blot them out of Remembrance; That it may please him graciously to afford his Blessing on the Governments of these States respectively, and prosper the public Council of the whole: To inspire our Commanders, both by Land and Sea, and all under them, with that Wisdom and Fortitude which may render them fit Instruments, under the Providence of Almighty GOD, to secure for these United States, the greatest of all human Blessings, INDEPENDENCE and PEACE: That it may please him, to prosper the Trade and Manufactures of the People, and the Labor of the Husbandman, that our Land may yield its Increase: To take Schools and Seminaries of Education, so necessary for cultivating the Principles of true Liberty, Virtue and Piety, under his nurturing Hand; and to prosper the Means of Religion, for the promotion and enlargement of that Kingdom, which consisteth “in Righteousness, Peace and Joy in the Holy Ghost.

    And it is further recommended, That servile Labor, and such Recreation, as, though at other Times innocent, may be unbecoming the Purpose of this Appointment, be omitted on so solemn an Occasion.”

    President George Washington – October 3, 1789:

    There was no official annual holiday of Thanksgiving in our country’s early days. Presidents declared a day of thanks as times dictated. As our first President, George Washington recognized the importance of God in the first official proclamation of Thanksgiving by the government of the United States of America, which he set to be held during the last Thursday of November. His proclamation was as follows:

    “Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor, and whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me “to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.

    Now therefore I do recommend and assign Thursday the 26th day of November next to be devoted by the People of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be. That we may then all unite in rendering unto him our sincere and humble thanks, for his kind care and protection of the People of this Country previous to their becoming a Nation, for the signal and manifold mercies, and the favorable interpositions of his providence, which we experienced in the course and conclusion of the late war, for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty, which we have since enjoyed, for the peaceable and rational manner, in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national One now lately instituted, for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed; and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and in general for all the great and various favors which he hath been pleased to confer upon us.

    And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech him to pardon our national and other transgressions, to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually, to render our national government a blessing to all the people, by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed, to protect and guide all Sovereigns and Nations (especially such as have shown kindness unto us) and to bless them with good government, peace, and concord. To promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us, and generally to grant unto all Mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as he alone knows to be best.

    Given under my hand at the City of New York the third day of October in the year of our Lord 1789.”

    Abraham Lincoln – October 3, 1863:

    During the American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln declared that a Thanksgiving Holiday be celebrated on the same day that our first President, George Washington, had celebrated it on. He declared that a day of thanks should be held on the last Thursday of November in 1863. In Lincoln’s proclamation, he asked the American people to thank our Creator for all that he had given them and to offer “humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience.” It was as follows:

    “The year that is drawing towards its close, has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God. In the midst of a civil war of unequalled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign States to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere except in the theatre of military conflict; while that theatre has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union. Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the fields of peaceful industry to the national defence, have not arrested the plough, the shuttle, or the ship; the axe had enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than heretofore. Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege and the battle-field; and the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years, with large increase of freedom.

    No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.

    It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and voice by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to his tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility and Union.

    In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

    Done at the city of Washington, this third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty three, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-eighth.”

    From 1863 to 1939, every President observed the last Thursday of November as a national day of thanks until President Roosevelt changed it in order to extend the holiday shopping season.

    God, Thanksgiving & Socialism

    When the first Pilgrims settled in the American colonies, they were not only escaping religious persecution in England, but they were trying to establish their ideal version of collectivism based upon communal sharing and altruism. Their goal was to create a society based upon Plato’s vision of Communism.

    The original colonists, therefore, decided that their society as a whole should benefit from the labor of the group, with all fruits of their labor divided equally amongst the people. An excellent article by Richard M. Ebeling titled, “The Real Meaning of Thanksgiving: The Triumph of Capitalism over Collectivism,” points out the failings of the Pilgrims’ Communistic experiment. He uses the head of the colony, Governor William Bradford’s, diary as proof that a system of shared wealth does not work. In Bradford’s piece, he modernizes the Old English language of Governor Bradford, providing the following translated quotes from the early Governor’s diary:

    “For the young men that were able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children, without recompense. The strong, or men of parts, had no more division of food, clothes, etc. then he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labor, and food, clothes, etc. with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignant and disrespect unto them. And for men’s wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc. they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could man husbands brook it.”

    Two years of the Socialistic experiment left the colony devastated by plague, starvation and death. The elders of the colony realized that if they did not do something quickly, the remaining 44 of the original 102 pilgrims would perish as well. They decided to allot a portion of land to each family and that the fate of each family would be the result of their own design. Governor Bradford wrote:

    “And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number for that end. . . .This had a very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little-ones with them to set corn, which before would alledge weakness, and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.” …

    “By this time harvest was come, and instead of famine, now God gave them plenty, and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God. And the effect of their planting was well seen, for all had, one way or other, pretty well to bring the year about, and some of the abler sort and more industrious had to spare, and sell to others, so as any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day.” …

    “The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years, and that amongst the Godly and sober men, may well convince of the vanity and conceit of Plato’s and other ancients; — that the taking away of property, and bringing into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort.” …

    “Let none object this is man’s corruption, and nothing to the curse itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in his wisdom saw another course fitter for them.”

    So, as we celebrate this Thanksgiving Day, it is up to each of us to decide what it is that we are thankful for. Is it the Indians who helped the ruthless evil white men from another land? Is it God who made our lives and all the wonders of it possible. Or, is it the original Pilgrims who adapted to a Capitalistic form of government that led to the United States becoming the greatest country on earth? Perhaps we should be thankful for all three.

    Happy Thanksgiving to one and all! – The Political Republican Opinion Blog

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “Gratitude unlocks the fullness of life. It turns what we have into enough, and more. It turns denial into acceptance, chaos to order, confusion to clarity. It can turn a meal into a feast, a house into a home, a stranger into a friend. Gratitude makes sense of our past, brings peace for today, and creates a vision for tomorrow.” - Melody Beattie

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • 23Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinio - Somalian Piracy threatens US interests The rise in piracy along the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden in recent months has given rise to fears that a premature withdrawal of US military forces in Iraq would lead to an explosion of piracy in the region and increased attacks on Iraqi citizens.

    During a press conference held in Baghdad yesterday, Iraqi defense minister, Abdel Qader Jassem Mohammed al-Obeidi, warned that if coalition forces “withdraw precipitously, our gulf will become like the Gulf of Aden, where there have been 95 acts of piracy.”[1]

    The ever-increasing boldness of the Somali-based piracy rings is apparent. Originally content with seizing fishing trawlers, returning the ships to their owners for a sizeable ransom, the pirates have moved on to bigger, better and more expensive vessels. Cargo ships have been frequent recent targets and now, with the seizure of the Sirius Star, a Saudi oil tanker, it appears that there is no limit to the type of ship that the ruthless mercenaries are willing to count on for their booty.

    According to the London-based research organization, Chatham House, the average ransom request is $1 million.[2] An estimated $100 million has already been collected by the marauders this year, alone.[3] The pirates controlling the Saudi oil tanker are demanding $25 million for its safe return. With the cost of the tanker in the range of $148 million and its precious crude oil cargo valued at over $100 million, a $25 million request for the safe release of the crew, ship and cargo are a relative bargain, it would seem.

    “What’s this have to do with us?” you may ask.

    Close to 20,000 ships pass through the Gulf of Aden every year; it is the main trade route for dry and manufactured goods between Asia, Europe and the Americas. The extra costs associated with bolstered security for these vessels would surely be passed down to consumers if it was at all practical to arm these ships; but, because they are not equipped to defend themselves, many shipping companies have chosen to avoid the Gulf of Aden altogether. Instead, some companies have chosen to take the long route around the southern tip of Africa, which adds an extra three weeks to shipping time. This further increases the costs associated with getting goods to the United States estimated at an extra $20,000 to $30,000 per day.[4]

    If the cost to our pocketbooks is not enough, more serious national security issues dwarf those concerns. The pirates have begun using satellite tracking devices, heavy weaponry and intelligence picked up from sources in ports. In an interview on Fox News this morning, former Scotland Yard chief inspector and National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit (NETCU) Superintendent, Steve Pearl, said the piracy groups are being aided by Islamic fundamentalists who are more than happy to receive kickbacks for their intelligence gathering assistance.

    Nato, the United States and numerous European nations have all sent ships to the region to try to stop the piracy. Nevertheless, the number of attacks on merchant ships has increased. South Korea, Japan, and Saudi Arabia are now also considering sending warships to help secure the area.

    As the world scrambles for answers to the piracy problem, Iraq is understandably concerned about its own national security. Obeidi said in the press conference that Iraqi territory risks being attacked by neighboring states, referring to Turkey’s bombing of Turkish Kurdish PKK rebels in the mountainous regions of northern Iraq.

    “Today, Iraq is the target of bombing from abroad but it is limited because the (US-led) coalition represents a dissuasion force. If it is not there any more, the whole country risks being the target of shooting, even (the southern port of) Basra, and they will justify their actions by referring to information on a PKK base there,” the Iraqi defense minister said.

    Obeidi also said his country has turned into “a battleground for different foreign intelligence services,” adding, “Iraqi security forces, backed by the coalition, must impose a limit on their activities, of which Iraqis are the victims.”

    One can only wonder if Barack Obama will continue to hold firm on his plan to extricate US troops from the Iraqi arena. As is usually the case, the world looks a whole lot more complicated when viewed from inside the Oval Office. Let’s hope that the people Barack Obama surrounds himself with have the wisdom and experience to guide the inexperienced new President-elect in the right direction and that he has the wisdom to make the right choices.

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “The United States brags about its political system, but the President says one thing during the election, something else when he takes office, something else at midterm and something else when he leaves.” - Deng Xiaoping

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • 21Nov

    Political Republican Opinion Blog Guest Writer: Tony Newell


    Barack Obama the Magician & God Ask any magician and he will tell you virtually every trick in the book relies, to some extent, upon distraction. Get the audience to look at the right hand while the left hides a quarter, or these days, a giraffe.

    Something tells me Savior-Elect Obama knows a thing or two about magic. In fact, it seems he has elevated the art to include the most effective distractive force known to man - his mouth.

    He began, at least as a headliner, by telling us his campaign would eschew race altogether, and instead focus on issues that matter to ordinary people. The niftiness of turning hope and warmth and soul-tickling into “issues” aside, Obama’s ability to sell this above-race- shtick to millions of Americans, all while glibly reminding us of how he doesn’t look like those “ guys on the dollar bills” or allowing his disciples in the press to denounce any criticism of him as racist, is nothing short of impressive.

    Then Obama, after promising to accept public financing for his general election campaign, decided he would opt out once it was clear John McCain would never match him dollar for dollar. For most candidates, that kind of stunt haunts them through November – but not Obama. An effortless rhetorical tweak and a few more meters about “change” and “politics as usual,” and everything is dandy.

    But this we’ve heard. This we know.

    Now is when the words begin to curdle. Now is when burden of responsibility manifests substance. Indefatigably, Barack Obama has promised to unite Washington and bring the country and its leaders together in a common cause for hope and prosperity and dandelions.

    But, where is this unity?

    So far the President-Elect’s strategy has been to stack his staff and cabinet with ardent progressive after partisan liberal, and if there isn’t a sufficiently liberal candidate to fill a position, it goes to a rival. After all, isn’t there an adage regarding the proximity of friends and enemies?

    Again, not exactly surprising to Obama’s many detractors. It would appear, in fact, that our forty-fourth President is poised to lend himself quite well to predictability.

    With that mentioned, allow me to briefly indulge in a bit of prognostication.

    Burdened with the responsibility of, well, responsibility, I imagine Barack Obama is going to have a tougher time keeping the crowd than he had winning it over. A seemingly inevitable nuclear Iran, a schizophrenic economy and a dysfunctional congress to exacerbate it are only the beginning of what the Messiah is going to have to face from the very start.

    Granted, it’s been my contention that, from this point on, the current economic atrophy will largely correct itself. However, the threats of Islamofacism and a contumacious Iran will do no such thing. Not only will both threats require sacrifice and resolve, but an audacity that has very little to do with hope and more to do with reality - there will be no more voting “present.”

    Given the imminence of geo-political turmoil, Obama’s next sleight of mouth will probably mean an increase in tough talk with Iran; probably to the extent of sufficiently convincing most Americans that he is nobody’s dove and that he really, really means business. This posturing, naturally, will be concomitant with “hard-nose negotiations” with Iran. These negotiations, of course, will take months if not years. After all, some will argue, Obama is a smooth talker, just give him some time.

    Eventually, Obama will have afforded Iran enough time to enrich enough Uranium to cross the “point of no return”-that is where an airstrike will result in a catastrophic release of radiation. At this point, any decisive and tolerable military option will be off the table and the game will have changed. President Obama will blame the failure on the previous administration, claiming he never had enough time to halt Iran’s progress, Israel is left to defend itself alone and the discussion in the U.S. immediately shifts to how we will successfully live with a nuclear Iran - assuredly an argument already being perfected by Obama’s “experts” (and one that is completely unacceptable).

    Naturally, I, and to be fair many others, could be wrong; and, I truly hope we are. But if not, the next chapter of our American story will be a grim one that all the charm and all the poetry in the world will not ameliorate.

    Let’s hope this next President has some other tricks up his sleeve; let’s hope he is saving the real magic for the big stage. But, if what we see is what we get, I fear we are in for a wicked show.

    The Political Republican Opinion Blog would like to thank Tony Newell for his submission and welcomes any other writers to send in their Conservative articles to be published, as well (just submit them via the Contact Us page).

    Political Republican Opinion Blog Quote of the Day: “I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization.” - Detronius Arbiter

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • 18Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - The US Constitution After losing the presidential election and witnessing their second consecutive landslide defeat in both houses of Congress, the Republican Party is scrambling. Despite claims that the mainstream media was biased toward Barack Obama (they were), they have no one to blame but themselves.

    The Party clearly needs to do a better job of defining themselves and also must take a serious look at some of the antiquated parts of their platform if they are to regain the trust of the American public and show that they really exist to defend the rights of individuals.

    So, what will it take for the Republican Party to re-energize itself in the modern era? Ten things need to be accomplished before the GOP can climb out of its funk and re-emerge as the pragmatic leaders they once were:

    1. Fiscal Responsibility

    Republican Congressmen must re-establish themselves as the Party of fiscal responsibility. The ridiculous spending that occurred during the Republican-led Congressional years from 2000-2006 will not soon be forgotten.

    The GOP can begin to redeem themselves in the next two years by following a simple principle: Not a single Republican should request earmarks and should oppose any piece of legislation that contains even an ounce of pork. Even if the rest of the legislation in a bill is acceptable, Republicans must loudly state their objections to it and declare that pork is the reason that it will not get their support.

    2. Cut Federal Spending:

    Americans are beginning to look seriously at their own budgets, making cuts to “wants” and concentrating on “needs.” Congress should be doing the same. Republicans in both the House and the Senate should lobby adamantly for cuts to federal programs that are wasting taxpayer money.

    3. Communicate with the Media:

    Actions don’t speak louder than words when those actions are never noticed because the words are never heard. Party members need to issue press releases and appear on any and all radio and television shows where they can show what they are doing to promote savings to taxpayers and tell the American public who is standing in the way of their efforts. I, for one, want to know which members of Congress are standing in the way of progress!

    4. Learn the Power of Social Media:

    The GOP has already taken the first step in communicating on the newest news medium - the Internet - by setting up the Republican For A Reason website. Although this was a good first step, the site is poorly optimized and its lack of buttons for social bookmarking shows that the Republican National Committee does not yet understand the concept.

    There is no more powerful way to get your message out on the web than to promote it through hub pages and social networks. If the webmaster for the site hasn’t taken the time to set up social bookmarking buttons, it is doubtful that he/she has taken the time to perform any of the manual submission chores associated with social bookmarking, either.

    5. Change the Republican Position on Abortion:

    While it is important to stand firm on its position regarding partial birth abortions, the federal funding of abortions and the Born Alive Act, until the GOP axes the Human Life Amendment from their agenda, they will always be alienating over half of the US voting base.

    This does not mean that Republicans shouldn’t state what they personally believe and what they would do if they or a family member was confronted with an unexpected pregnancy. It does, however, mean that the GOP needs to realize that these are highly personal decisions and that looking to overturn Roe vs. Wade will not accomplish anything other than to diminish their potential voter base.

    Just as prohibition did nothing to stop the consumption of alcohol in this country, making abortions illegal would return us to the far more dangerous illegal abortions practices that occurred before Roe vs. Wade.

    Instead, Republican Congressmen should concentrate their efforts on ensuring that women facing this highly emotionally decision have all the facts and alternatives available to them and that those who choose to make the unsettling choice for an abortion, have the emotional support they need and that the procedures are being performed in the safest way possible.

    6. Traditional Marriage:

    Again, I believe that the Republican Party has missed the boat here. A federal mandate on the definition of marriage is unnecessary and is counterproductive to the concept of a republic of people who are free to make their own decisions without federal government intervention.

    States and the people who live in those states need to have the freedom to make these decisions. Each state can makes its own laws relating to this issue and whether or not they will recognize same-sex marriages that may have been legal in other states. The individual will then have the ability to choose where they want to live based upon those laws.

    Why the federal government believes they need to dive into this tempest in a teapot is beyond me.

    7. Fight to overturn the Kelo Decision:

    An individual’s right to property is a concept originally introduced by John Locke and later refined by Thomas Paine in his book, The Rights of Man. In that book, Paine wrote, “The right to property being inviolable and sacred, no one ought to be deprived of it, except in cases of evident public necessity, legally ascertained, and on condition of just indemnity.”

    When the US Supreme Court upheld the decision by the state of Connecticut’s highest court - that the government could seize individual homes and property from citizens in order to benefit the interests of a private land developer without just compensation in the form of current market value - a serious breach of trust occurred.

    Sandra Day O’Connor correctly argued that the decision eliminates “any distinction between private and public use of property—and thereby effectively delete[s] the words ‘for public use’ from the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.”

    There was no evident public necessity for the takeover of these peoples’ homes (unless you consider a Pfizer, Inc. research facility, a pedestrian riverwalk, a state park, a U.S. Coast Guard Museum and a “small urban village” including a waterfront hotel “necessities”) nor were the former owners justly compensated for their property (unless you consider valuing the property at pre-development rates a fair estimate of a property’s value).

    Until the GOP proves that the individual is more important than corporate interests, people will always be skeptical about whose rights the Party is really fighting for. The Republican Party needs to let the American public know that they will fight to reinstitute the principle of property rights that was important to our founding fathers and that they will battle to overturn the horrible precedent set by the Supreme Court in the Kelo Decision that allowed a developer to steal a person’s property.

    8. Energy Independence:

    The Republican Party needs to do a much better job of convincing the American public that they are willing to explore every viable form of energy that exists. While it is true that they should continue their fight to allow drilling in ANWR and off the coast of the United States, they need to show that the GOP plan involves far more than “drill here, drill now.”

    The Republican Party needs to step out of the shadows and into the light, showing that they are at the forefront on alternative energy issues. Paying lip service to the concept of human involvement in global warming is not enough. There are far more important issues at hand when it comes to energy independence.

    Our national security and economic survival depends on weaning ourselves off oil for our energy needs. While we are drilling for our own supplies, I would like to see a Republican panel put together that would focus entirely on funding research for wind, solar, clean coal and nuclear technologies. Forget being bipartisan here; the GOP needs to show the nation that it is the real Party of energy independence.

    9. Judges:

    The Republican Party needs to emphasize their belief in the US Constitution and that they will only support judges who interpret the Constitution, rather than legislate from the bench based upon their own individual beliefs. This will help to ensure that the [un]Fairness Doctrine is held as an unconstitutional Act and that our right to bear arms remains intact.

    10. Less Government Means More Freedom:

    The Republican Party needs to stop sending out mixed signals. If the GOP truly believes that there should be less government intervention in the lives of Americans, they cannot possibly support some of the stances listed above that restrict the freedoms of so many Americans.

    Tolerance for others who are different from us is the key to social harmony and what makes the American melting pot the model for all societies. Until the Republican Party proves that they can keep their hands out of our pockets and their noses out of our lives, they will struggle to gain the acceptance of the American public at large.

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “Facts are stubborn things; and, whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” – John Adams

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • 17Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    We haven’t heard from the good ole’ boys at the Red State update in awhile.

    After the election, the boys were quite upset about Barack Obama’s win. In part one of the update, the boys re-evaluate whether the good old USA is worth living in anymore …


    After booking their airline tickets, Jackie and Dunlap head for Canada in search of a more optimistic future. They soon find out, however, that the answer to a better life isn’t in the Great White North.

    A card from a special person causes them to rethink their move …


    I hope these good ole’ boys do better than our last candidate did. One thing’s for sure; they won’t be pandering across the aisle for crossover votes!

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: To say that any people are not fit for freedom, is to make poverty their choice, and to say they had rather be loaded with taxes than not.” – Thomas Paine

    Technorati Tags: , , ,

    Tags: , , ,

  • 16Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Steroids in baseball

    It’s the bottom of the ninth, with two outs and the home team is at the plate. The score is tied and the runner on first, Andy Amphetamine, has taken a wide lead off of the bag.

    The pitcher, Henry (HGH) Humphries, glances over his left shoulder, decides his heat is enough to negate the runner’s big lead and he fires a rocket toward the plate.

    The batter, Sammy Steroid, anticipating the star pitcher would be offering his famous, flaming, fastball, begins swinging as the ball is leaving the hurler’s hand. An explosive transfer of weight occurs as he pushes off of his back leg and begins his swing.

    Both dugouts feel the air from the pumped-up behemoth’s tremendous swing as he connects with the ball, launching it down the left field line over the leaping third baseman, Andy Alcoholic.

    Left fielder Craig Cocaine, realizing he won’t quite make it to the ball, lets it whiz by, preferring to play the ricochet off of the wall. He gallops at breakneck speed toward the wall, fields the carom on the fly, pivots, and rifles a one-hopper toward the plate. It’s going to be a close play.

    Wesley Workout, the gym rat catcher, senses the potential game-winning runner streaking toward him, just feet away from the plate, as he snaps up the one-hopper. The muscle-bound catcher braces himself for the inevitable collision, his body easily absorbing the brutal shock, as he holds onto the ball.

    Out number three; the game moves on to extra innings …

    My apologies to baseball “purists;” but, as a fan of the game of baseball, I can’t imagine a more exciting play than the one illustrated above. I don’t care what these guys have done to get themselves into the shape they are in. I am only interested in seeing riveting action.

    From the time that the first ball was thrown, players of the game of baseball (and all other walks of life be it other sports, academia or the business world) have been doing whatever they could to be the best. If a “magic pill” that could make a person jump higher, run faster and react quicker existed fifty years ago, I guarantee you that players would have been lining up to take it.

    We have no idea what players were doing in the “golden era of the game” because the media, both professional and amateur, was not the same as it is today. “But steroids are illegal,” the purists say, conveniently forgetting that their hero, Babe Ruth, was downing more alcohol during prohibition than a body should be able to endure.

    “It’s cheating the players who do it the right way,” they continue, and this is a valid point! I can’t help but wonder; however, where to draw the line? Is it “natural” to spend hours in the gym, sculpting each muscle of one’s body? Is it “natural” to take supplements that have not made it onto the banned list? How many cups of coffee or energy drinks constitute crossing that line between natural and artificial performance?

    Each player must make his own decision. Does he have enough natural ability to keep up with other players? Does he have the work ethic to spend the hours in the gym necessary to keep each muscle at its peak? How many extra hours beyond the already countless road trip time is he willing to spend away from his family? Is it worth risking his reputation? Is it worth risking being caught by the law?

    These are undoubtedly tough decisions to make. Decisions made tougher still, when a player sees the benefits that are being derived from players who are not “doing it the right way.” When a starting roster spot is on the line, how much is he willing to risk for that spot?

    This is a game. It is entertainment. I find it so unbelievably offensive that 20 million dollars of taxpayers’ hard-earned money was spent on the Mitchell Report. I find it incomprehensible that our government officials felt that there were not things in this country that the money could not have been better spent on.

    I realize that there are those who believe that our impressionable youth look at some of the record-breaking players of today’s era of baseball and think, “if it worked for them, it may work for me!” I also believe that if the higher-and-mightier-than-thou media and government officials did not focus so much effort on exposing those players, the youth of America might not even be looking at steroids as a potential performance booster.

    As is the situation with many of these “role model” cases, it is up to each parent to raise their own kids. It is up to them to instill the moral values that will shape the decisions their children make as they leave the nest and face the tough decisions in life. It is far too convenient in today’s society to always pass the buck, blaming others for the problems that each individual is surely responsible for.

    I, myself, choose free will. I have the power to make my own decisions and the responsibility of dealing with the consequences of those decisions. Should I watch another re-run of Seinfeld or the game tonight? If it’s as exciting as the fictitious game referenced above, I’ll take the baseball game every time!

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “When I was a small boy growing up in Kansas, a friend of mine and I went fishing and as we sat there in the warnth of a summer afternoon on a riverbank, we talked about what we wanted to do when we grew up. I told him that I wanted to be a real major league baseball player, a genuine professional like Honus Wagner. My friend said that he’d like to be President of the United States. Neither of us got our wish.” - Dwight D. Eisenhower

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • 13Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Obama Marxist In an interview earlier this week, US House of Representatives member, Paul Broun, called President-elect Barack Obama a Marxist and likened him to Adolf Hitler. His words could not have been clearer:

    “It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he’s the one who proposed this national security force,” Broun told the AP in the Monday interview. “I’m just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may - may not, I hope not - but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism.”

    Broun’s comments were in reference to a July speech by Barack Obama in which the President-elect called for “a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded” as the US military.

    Broun told the AP, “That’s exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it’s exactly what the Soviet Union did. When he’s proposing to have a national security force that’s answering to him that is as strong as the US military, he’s showing me signs of being a Marxist.

    “We can’t be lulled into complacency,” Broun continued, “You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. I’m not comparing him to Adolf Hitler. What I’m saying is there is the potential.”

    Now, after a sea of protests in regards to the comments, the Georgia representative is backpedaling:

    “I regret putting it that way,” Broun told WGAC radio in Augusta, GA. “I apologize to anyone who has taken offense at that.”

    Broun added, “The point I tried to make is that he is extremely liberal, he has promoted a lot of socialistic ideas, and it just makes me concerned.”

    Don’t you just love it when someone insults another person and then pretends he didn’t mean the insult by saying that he didn’t intend to offend anyone? Isn’t it pitiful when a Congressman slinks away with his tail between his legs?

    You said it, Mr Broun, now be a man and stand behind your words. There are surely invertebrates with more backbone than you. If I lived in Georgia, I wouldn’t re-elect you solely on your lack of mettle!

    The Obama transition office, however, didn’t seem at all offended by the Congressman. In fact, they had no comments at all in regards to the Congressman’s allegations.

    It seems eerily like the shrug given when “Joe the Plumber” challenged Barack Obama for his notion of “spreading the wealth around.” Their indifference to Broun’s words is highly disturbing to say the least!

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy length over City, State, and Nation… It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection.”– John F. Hylan (Mayor of New York City, 1918-1925)

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 11Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - A welfare State? Barack Obama wants every student who wants to go to college, to be able to do it. In order to make that possible, he says he wants to give every college student a $4,000 “college credit” every year in exchange for 100 hours of community service each year. At my college, even the star football players didn’t manage a sweet $40/hour summer gig!

    It’s an admirable goal. I mean, don’t we all want any kid who desires to attend college and has the grades for it, to be able to live that dream? Don’t we all also want to help some organization out that is serving the greater good on behalf of our communities? Two birds are killed with one stone here! (Sorry, bird lovers, for the insensitive avicide remark.)

    It’s just like healthcare. Of course everyone should be able to see a doctor, have an operation and get whatever subscription drugs that they need. Or how about home ownership. Wouldn’t it be great if we all could afford that dream?

    Unfortunately, we live in the real world … a world where things cost money. Doctors don’t work for free. Nor do teachers, construction workers or, for that matter, our elected officials. If we all were handed everything we needed, who would need to work? If no one worked, how would we get the things we needed? Quite the tangled paradox we have here, isn’t it?

    Every citizen has been afforded the opportunity to succeed in this country. Both Barack and Michelle Obama claim that they came from very humble beginnings yet somehow, despite living in a country that has what he describes as a “broken system,” they managed to not only succeed professionally, but have become our next president and first lady. How is this possible? Oh, and to paraphrase Barack Obama, did I mention they are black?

    I have a funny feeling it has something to do with hard work. Kudos to both Michelle and Barack for beating the odds and becoming successful. The thing is, though, they didn’t really beat the odds. We are all given the same set of dice; each has six sides and two cubes. Some are playing in back alleys and others on imported marble tile, but it’s still the same game; the odds are the same of winning or losing.

    Some expect to win, however, while others assume that they have lost before the first throw of the dice occurs. The success or failure of any individual may very well be a self-fulfilling prophesy. If you are told by your parents, your peers, your teachers, your preachers and yes, even your politicians, that you are doomed for failure, that the odds are stacked against you, you are bound to lack the will or desire to succeed and invariably you will not. Even Oprah could tell you that!

    If your politicians tell you that you need their help, you undoubtedly will. Why strive to prove them wrong? Why try to be better than they think you are? They are giving free stuff away, right? There’s no reason to succeed.

    And who do they want to pay for all of the free stuff? That’s right, the successful people who beat the odds, who refused to take no for an answer; the people who refused to accept failure, who went ahead and rolled the dice; the people who lost game after game before finally getting on a roll; the people who refused to listen to their line of craps!

    Then again, maybe I’m wrong. I have been working my butt off my entire life, sometimes working more than one job, and still find myself treading water. Of course, I’ve never made $40 an hour. We don’t have unions here in Florida unless you count Walt Disney World. (Did you ever wonder why tickets cost $65 to get in and why a one dollar hamburger costs six bucks?)

    $40/hour is more than $83,000 a year (that’s with no overtime). My wife and I work a combined 100 hours per week and don’t make that combined, yet he wants me to pay that to college students to do volunteer work? I have a better plan, Mr. Obama. My wife and I will both do our patriotic duty and help those organizations in our communities that need assistance for the bargain price of $30/hour. We’ll save the taxpayers money, bring a far more advanced skill set to the table and gladly take home the nearly $125,000. It’s a win-win for everybody!

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: For the ordinary man is passive. Within a narrow circle (home life, and perhaps the trade unions or local politics) he feels himself master of his fate, but against major events he is as helpless as against the elements. So far from endeavoring to influence the future, he simply lies down and lets things happen to him.” – George Orwell

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • 08Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    A clip from a Finnish documentary about elections in America has recently appeared on YouTube. The clip shows a public elementary school teacher in Ashville North Carolina asking students who they support in the election.

    One student, whose father is in the military, says she is supporting John McCain. “Oh, Jesus,” the teacher replies, before telling the girl that our troops are fighting “a senseless war” in Iraq. She tells the child that John McCain says that our troops could stay in Iraq for another 100 years and implies that the child may never see her daddy again.

    When questioned by the interviewer, the teacher says that she can support who she wants to support as long as she doesn’t browbeat another person for the candidate that they support. This teacher clearly has an ill-conceived definition of the word “browbeat,” as she ridicules the child in front of her classmates. It is a shocking example of how poorly educated the people teaching our students really are. She cannot even properly pronounce Barack Obama’s name. Apparently, the public school system has no problem with bringing up Jesus’ name as long as it is in vain, though.

    This has got to stop! I will not support a school system that believes that it must indoctrinate our children at an early age to think the way that it wants them to think. The school system has long supported the pro-union Democratic Party but they must not be able to kidnap our children’s thoughts.

    I have no problem with a balanced discussion of political matters in a classroom where that discussion belongs, like a social studies class, and at an appropriate grade level. We need a law on the books that terminates any teacher immediately who injects their political opinions into a classroom that is paid for with taxpayer money. When I went to public school, none of this kind of stuff ever happened. We actually spent our time on math, reading and writing.

    Since I do not speak Finnish, I can only wonder what conclusion was reached by the filmers of this documentary. I imagine it was that America is indoctrinating children in the school system starting at an early age. See the video clip, below:



    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: There is no accountability in the public school system - except for coaches. You know what happens to a losing coach. You fire him. A losing teacher can go on losing for 30 years and then go to glory.” – Ross Perot

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • 06Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Barack Obama in the shadows According to WTHR - Eyewitness News, Indianapolis, 375 people who were part of Barack Obama’s “Vote Corps Program” - a group hired to get last-second voters into the polls for Barack Obama - lined up in front of Obama headquarters yesterday, angrily demanding the money they were owed for their services.

    Police were called to the scene to control the mob and make sure that things did not get out of hand.

    Although all of the people did eventually get paid, many of them were shorted pay for the hours they worked.

    “It should have been $480. It’s $230,” complained Imani Sankofa.

    “They gave us $10 an hour. So we added it. I added up all the hours, so it was supposed to be at least $120. All I get is $90,” said Charles Martin.

    “I worked nine hours a day for 4 days and got paid half of what I should have earned,” said Randall Waldon.

    The Obama campaign promised to mail the underpaid workers a check for the amount they were shorted, but quite a few were skeptical.

    “They say that they gonna call you or they going to mail it to you, but I don’t know. We’ll see what happens,” said Antron Grose.

    “Talking about they’ll mail it to us. I ain’t worried about that, man. They’re not going to mail nothin’,” Martin groused.

    Hopefully, Barack Obama makes good on the pay he owes to the people who worked so hard to get him elected. Otherwise, it’s not looking good for the rest of America that are counting on Barack Obama to keep his promises.

    You can read the full WTHR article here: Obama campaign: Unpaid wages resolved.

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: The President has kept all of the promises he intended to keep.” - George Stephanopolous

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 05Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - President Obama Congratulations to our new President-elect. The election is over and the country has decided upon Barack Obama as our new incoming President. Out of respect for the position, I have removed the ads for the “NoBama” T-Shirt and the “Obama Nation” book from the sidebar.

    I have always believed that no matter what one’s own personal views are, the President of the United States is a person who deserves the utmost respect of the citizens of this country. He is your country to the rest of the world and vulgar attacks on him, whoever he may be, weaken our country in the eyes of other nations of the world.

    Before entering the blogging world, I wrote a top-rated article for Helium about this. In that article, I wrote, “It does not matter if you voted for him or not. It does not matter if you agree with all of the President’s decisions. You may not like the way your sister is dressing lately, but you most certainly would not sit idly by as someone calls her a tramp!”

    This is not to say that the President shouldn’t be held accountable for things over which he has control. In most cases and in other years, though, I have given the President a pass, since the House of Representatives and the Senate are chiefly responsible for enacting the laws that shape our country’s policies. The President only has the power to veto those Acts and, even in those cases, a President’s vetoes can be overridden with enough Congressional support for any particular bill.

    Barack Obama, however, will not have the luxury of being able to blame Congress. The Democrats have a HUGE majority in both houses of Congress. He should have a free pass in getting anything he has promised through the Legislative Branch. Barack Obama has been given the penultimate opportunity to pass with flying colors or to fail miserably.

    Only time will tell which it will be.

    I have copied his entire website and will be adding a section to my blog entitled “The Obama Report Card.” It will be divided into sections so that visitors to the blog can check on President Obama’s progress in getting the things he has promised that are important to them, accomplished. Each section will have a list and the items on the list will appear in RED until they are accomplished. Once completed, the items will turn GREEN.

    I encourage all visitors to the blog to not only check out that list to see how he is progressing, but to remind me of any items that President Obama has accomplished that I have neglected to change from red to green. There is no immediate rush to get the report card section onto the website (yes, I’ve already started it), since it will be another two-and-a-half months until President-elect Obama is inaugurated.

    I will continue to criticize the members of the legislature when they are doing something that I see as being detrimental to our country’s interests or to Conservative principles. I, too, reserve the right to respectfully post my disagreements with decisions made by the new President.

    Hopefully, President Obama will not receive the same level of disrespect, regardless of the job he is doing, as our current President has and I discourage any who comment on this blog in the future from using discourteous language. I also hope that all of my fears of Barack Obama have been unfounded and that he turns out to be a fantastic President, leading our country to new and great heights.

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: I have no ambition to govern men; it is a painful and thankless office.” – Thomas Jefferson

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • 03Nov

    Political Republican Opinion: Political Repubican Opinion - Barack Obama will re-unite with Reverend Wright Larry Walker forwarded me an excellent post by Michael Graham that appeared on his blog, The Natural Truth. The title of the post is STILL The Question No Obama Supporter Can Answer. The post compares the incredibly intelligent argument that Charles Krauthammer has laid out for why he is voting for John McCain and compares it to the sophomoric one that the Boston Globe-Democrat lays out for Barack Obama. The author then goes on to lay out his own unique perspective. My favorite part of the piece is where Michael Graham writes: “How can you vote for a man who chose, every Sunday for 20 years, to attend a racist, anti-Semitic, anti-American church run by a lunatic? Sunday after Sunday, even the Sundays after 9/11, this man - this free moral agent - made the decision, “You know where I belong today? Listening to the racist rantings of Rev. Wright. Honey, grab the kids and let’s bring them too!” I have already asked this question of many of my Democrat friends and (I cringe to admit it) family members. Mr. Graham is correct; it is a question for which there is no good answer. They may be able to blow off the role that Wright played in the lives of Barack and Michelle Obama, reasoning that they were adult enough to separate the hatred from the sermons. All of them agree that the children should not have been exposed to this, however. Barack Obama sees no problem with it, however. After all, his indoctrination began at an early age, too!

    Technorati Tags: , , , ,

    Tags: , , , ,

  • 03Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - It ain't over 'til the fat lady sings The time has come to get out and vote. I have done all that I can to inform readers of the facts that have not been reported in the mainstream Liberal media. For the most part, I have been preaching to the choir.

    Now is not the time to stifle your voice; it is not the time to lie down and let the United States of America become transformed into a Socialist welfare state. Although it may not seem like it, your lone vote counts. Your single voice when joined by millions of other voices makes the Republican Party the most powerful choir in the world.

    We can prevent a new director from taking the baton and snapping it in half. This man does not want to hear you sing; he doesn’t like our songs. He prefers “La Marsseillace” and “Das Deutschlandlied.” We can keep Barack Obama from stifling our voices, but we need to let them be heard now, more than ever before.

    John McCain wound up his nomination speech at the Republican National Convention with the following words:

    “I’m going to fight for my cause every day as your president. I’m going to fight to make sure every American has every reason to thank God, as I thank Him: that I’m am American, a proud citizen of the greatest country on earth, and with hard work, strong faith and a little courage, great things are always within our reach.

    Fight with me. Fight with me.

    Fight for what’s right for our country.

    Fight for the ideals and character of a free people.

    Fight for our children’s future.

    Fight for justice and opportunity for all.

    Stand up to defend our country from its enemies.

    Stand up for each other; for beautiful, blessed, bountiful America.

    Stand up, stand up, stand up and fight. Nothing is inevitable here. We’re Americans, and we never give up. We never quit. We never hide from history. We make history.”

    Barack and Michelle Obama, on the other hand, have denigrated the United States of America and have expressed the shame they feel for this country on numerous occasions. From Rezko to Wright to Khalidi, from Ayers to Farrakhan to ACORN, the people they have chosen to associate with for the past twenty years shows a very clear picture of who they really are. They do not like this country. They sing a different song. As the Reverend Wright has said, “it’s not ‘God Bless America’ … no, no, no … it’s ‘GOD DAMN AMERICA.’”

    John McCain has fought for this country; he loves this country and sings its praises every day. It is time to join McCain and let his song be heard. We can fix the broken things in this country. We can right the few wrongs. The fundamentals of the United States of America are strong and have made it the greatest country in the world since its beginning.

    That strength starts with you. The mainstream Liberal media has tried to convince you to stay home, that the race is already lost. They have told you that the Republicans will lose all of their vacating seats to Democrats and that a super majority is going to happen in the US Congress. They have told you that Barack Obama has already won.

    Don’t let the biased media fool you! The fat lady is sleeping off her last big meal. It’s time to let your voice be heard. It’s time to vote, not just for John McCain, but for every single Republican on the ballot. We have the numbers. We can claim this country back!

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 02Nov

    Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Barack Obama Smoking Every poll seems to indicate that there are still a significant amount of “undecided” voters out there. Personally, I believe that “undecided” is really a euphemism for “apathetic” and that the majority of these people are not going to be voting at all.

    If you are undecided and do intend to vote, the only reason that I can fathom that you have not made a decision is because you are unsure of who the candidates are and what they really stand for.

    I imagine that undecided voters are pretty sure who John McCain is. They may not agree with all of McCain’s policies (neither do I) and may be influenced by the Obama campaign’s negative attack ads that paint him as too old or too “big business.” They may be unclear of what McCain’s health care plan really is (I don’t blame them; he hasn’t explained it very well). There are undoubtedly other issues that may be holding them back from voting for John McCain. They can put a finger on those issues at least, and name them.

    Barack Obama, on the other hand, is an enigma. His message is positive and encouraging but his words are measured; his promises, vague. His campaign has been polished and perfect but there is something about him that many undecided voters are uneasy about. They want to vote for him, but one thing is holding them back. That one thing is trust. They do not know who the man really is because the media has protected him and has not done a proper job of vetting him for this country’s most important position.

    Many people have written snippets about Barack Obama’s background. Extensive research has been attempted and many doors have been slammed in the faces of those who have tried to pry too far into Barack Obama’s past.

    A commendable effort at combining those snippets into a thorough history of Barack Obama has been made by Dr. Kate, a guest author on Texas Darlin’s blog. Her article, “The Trojan Candidate,” is an extremely thorough look at the life of Barack Obama.

    There are many significant quotes in the article. The one that made the hair on my neck stand up was one by Saul Alinsky, a transformational Marxist who is credited with developing the seditious role of community organizing. In his book, “Rules for Radicals,” Alinsky defined precisely the role of a community organizer as he saw it:

    “It was Alinsky for whom ‘change’ was his mantra. And by ‘change’, he meant a Marxist revolution achieved by slow, incremental, Machiavellian means which turned society inside out. This had to be done through systematic deception, winning the trust of the naively idealistic middle class by using the language of morality to conceal an agenda designed to destroy it. And the way to do this, he said, was through ‘people’s organisations’. Community organisers would mobilise direct action by the oppressed masses against their capitalist oppressors.”

    I warn you, “The Trojan Candidate” is not a short piece. If you are one of the apathetic undecided voters, don’t even bother clicking the link to the well-constructed and detailed article. If, on the other hand, you are one of the undecided voters who are on the fence, one who will be voting but need a little more background into who Barack Obama really is, I implore you to take the time to better inform yourself. The future of this country may depend on you!

    Political Republican Opinion Quote of the Day: “There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.” - John Adams

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

« Previous Entries   

Recent Comments

  • I found that the Civil Rights Department is mainly concern w...
  • Keep an eye on the monkey business in Washington at www.fail...
  • Quicker note: My website changed. Click link....
  • Wow! You guys ROCK! RANDOM!...
  • Joe - You are simply shooting the messenger, here. I am not ...