Political Republican Offers:

Make Real Money
Taking Pictures

Political Republican Opinion book - Income From Photography

If you enjoy taking photos, then starting a photography business will be easy and achievable for you. Learn how to earn up to $720 part time, per week form this guide ... Guaranteed!

Start doing what you love! Just $37.83 gets you the most popular photography business guide on the internet.

Click Here To Get
Income From Photography
Today!

 

Unlimited Wii Downloads

Political Republican Opinion - Wii image

Access the fastest and largest Wii downloads database on the Internet. Members have access to Unlimited Wii Games, Movies, TV Shows, Software and More!

No monthly fees or per-download charges. A one-time fee of $49.95 gets you access for life to the most up-to-date Wii games!

Click Here to Get Started Now!

 

Free Internet Money-Making
Training Seminar

Political Republican Opinion - Free Internet Training

Wealth Training By The Master

Russell Brunson is going to personally train you to make money online for free, and he wants everyone to make a collective $100 Million Dollars! Best part? Proceeds from the contest go to World Teacher Aid.

Click Here to get the details and Start Making Money Now!

 

Stock Trading
On Autopilot

Political Republican Opinion - Stock Trading Software

Make Money While You Sleep!

This amazing piece of software allows individuals to leave their computer on autopilot, as it makes real time decisions based upon market conditions. Whether you are experienced in FOREX trading or a complete novice, Forex Autopilot does the work for you, leveling the playing field for all.

The introductory rate of $99.00 for this amazing software won't last forever, so Click Here to get your copy today!

 

Don't Tread On Me Flag

Don't let government take your voice, America. Fly the Don't Tread On Me flag.

Click Here To Get Yours Today!

 

Pages

  • 30Aug

    The Political Republican Opinion blog recently found this NoBama Lennon Beatle parody about the real Nowhere Man… Barack Hussein Obama.

    The video primarily explores racism and the racists that Obama has chosen to surround himself with. It also makes brief references to some of the other undesirables that causes some to question the patriotism of Barack Obama.

    If you are like me, you may have to pause the video several times so that you can read some of the comments and read the political cartoons.

    How anyone could vote for a man who has chosen to surround himself with such lowlife scum, is beyond me!




    Originally aired on episode 45 of Chimpsy’s Real American. www.chimpsyradio.con/cra.html

    Duration : 0:3:30

    Continue reading »

    Technorati Tags: , , , ,

    Tags: , , , ,

  • 28Aug

    Political Republican Opinion: Political Republican - William Ayers
    I was listening to the Glenn Beck radio show today and the subject of Barack Obama’s relationship with William Ayers came up and why it is relevant. Liberals will say, “William Ayers did all that stuff when Obama was eight. How can you hold Barack Obama accountable for stuff that another man did when Obama was just a child?”
    Glenn Beck went into quite a lengthy dissertation of why it is relevant today. The transcript is as follows:

    Why do you announce your campaign at this guy’s house? Now, who is he? Let me give you the history of William Ayers. I gave it to you in a thumbnail. You can find it several places. The most concise comes out of ‘101 Professors,’ and this is a book about the worst professors in America, okay? William Ayers is a professor at the University of Illinois Chicago. Wait a minute. A connection to University of Illinois and Barack Obama. Isn’t this where Barack Obama also has taught some classes and used Solwinski, yet another 1960s radical, another anarchist? Yes.

    William Ayers, he’s the leader of the Weathermen. It was a group of students for a Democratic society. This is in 1969. They went underground to become America’s very first terrorist cult. The Weathermen have been described by Ayers as “An American red army.” Got it? American communist army. I don’t believe we’ve had other armies in this country. American red army.

    In 1969 the Weather Underground issued a formal declaration of war on America. And by the way, America is spelled A M E R I KKK A. Sound familiar? Is there anybody else in Barack Obama’s life? Is there anybody else in Barack Obama’s life that has described U.S. of KKK A? They attempted to incite white student radicals to engage in terrorist activities that would provoke a race war in America, spelled with three Ks. White radicals would shed their white skin privilege to aid third world peoples in plundering the ill gotten wealth of the United States. Ayers summed up the ideology as, ‘Kill all the rich people; break up their cars and apartments; bring the revolution home; kill your parents.’I don’t care how long it has been since you said this; that phrase should stay with you as an albatross around your neck for the rest of your life!

    Now, that again was said in the 1960s. So let’s continue to follow the repentant attitude of Mr. Williams Ayers who again said ‘kill all the rich.’ Listen to this in the context of the message of Barack Obama. I do not believe Barack Obama wants to kill the rich. I do not believe that Barack Obama would ever say or ever want anyone to kill their parents. That is not Barack Obama. However, listen to Barack Obama’s rhetoric on socialism. Listen to his rhetoric on class warfare. Listen and put this into context with what Obama says about the working man and the best way for the working men, that there has to be a fundamental change of redistribution of wealth. [Or,] to put [it] into Michelle Obama’s words, “Some people are going to have to give up their piece of pie so others can have more.” Same words [by Barack Obama], just let me rephrase. ‘I don’t agree with their tactics, but I understand their point of view.’ ‘Kill all the rich people; break up their cars and parts; bring the revolution home; kill your parents.’

    The Weather Underground managed to bomb the U.S. capitol building, New York City police headquarters, the Pentagon, the National Guard offices in Washington D.C., among many other targets. In 1970, three of the members blew themselves up in a Manhattan townhouse where they were making a bomb they planned to set off at a social dance for young military recruits and their dates at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The FBI was unable to catch Ayers and his other cohorts. They were protected; [now] listen carefully … They were protected by the networks of the progressive left. They were protected by the networks of the progressive left, including their expensive lawyers, for five years, until the organizations dissolved through internal conflict. So, for five years, the progressive left, with all of their money, protected them, using the progressive left’s attorneys until the Weather Underground finally broke apart.

    They surfaced again in 1980. They received no serious jail time for their crimes, being let off on a technicality that they had been improperly surveilled. So they didn’t really serve any jail time for blowing up anything because the pigs were doing things they shouldn’t have done.

    They went back to college where their political comrades now tenured in faculty helped them embark on new careers. Ayers became a professor of early childhood education and a senior university scholar at the University of Illinois Chicago. He has never changed or modified his political views. Professor Ayers has written a series of books about parenting, including to become a teacher, city kids, city teachers. His most recent book, ‘Fugitive Days,’ is a memoir of his Weathermen exploits. In chaotic text, professor Ayers recounts his life as a 1960s radical, his role as an organizer in the 1969 days of rage riots in Chicago, his tenure as a Weatherman leader, his terrorist campaign across America and in his most recent book, his hatred for America, he says, ‘What a country. It makes me want to puke.’

    When interviewed shortly after surfacing from the terrorist underground in a kindergarten where he was already teaching, Ayers comment, reflecting on his fortunes was, ‘Guilty as hell, free as a bird, America. What a great country. In recounting his bombing crusade, he has said, ‘There’s something about a good bomb. Night after night, day after day, each majestic scene I witnessed was so terrible and so unexpected that no city would ever soon stand innocently fixed in my mind. Big buildings and wide streets, cement and steel were no longer permanent. They, too, were fragile and destructible. A torch, a bomb, a strong enough wind. And they, too, would come undone or get knocked down.”‘

    In unbelievable irony, he was interviewed. The New York Times ran a profile of him to mark the publication of the book that I just quoted from. That article ran on September 11th, 2001. While the world was watching the World Trade Centers come down, nobody picked up the paper to read the New York Times that day because already the news was old. But this is what he was quoted as saying in the New York Times on September 11th, 2001: ‘I don’t regret setting bombs; I don’t feel we did enough.’ Of the day he bombed the Pentagon, Professor Ayers wrote in his memoir, ‘Everything was absolutely ideal. The sky was blue. The birds were singing and the bastards were finally going to get what was coming to them.’When reflecting on whether or not he would use bombs against the U.S. in future, a senior university scholar, Williams Ayers writes, ‘I can’t imagine entirely dismissing the possibility.’

    That is William Ayers. By the way, [in] his book, ‘A Kind and Just Parent,’ he argues that we have to overcome our prejudices concerning violent juvenile offenders. In his book that came out in 2001, ‘Zero Tolerance: Resisting the Drive for Punishment in our Schools,’ Professor Ayers argues against expelling children from classrooms - especially if they are black or Latino. In a book that came out in 2004 in teaching towards freedom, moral commitment and ethical action in the classroom, Professor Ayers writes that an unrepented … I’m sorry, the unrepentant terrorist writes an evocative lesson about education and humanity. I don’t know who he is; he is apparently a communist bureaucrat and Malcolm X. In order to explain what students should be for and what students should be against. Malcolm X and a communist is what our children should be taught so they know what they should be for and against.

    That’s William Ayers. Now, you can dismiss this man and say, ‘well, that’s [the] 1960s!’ No, it’s not! He has never said, “I’ve changed my ways.” He never said, “Well, I did stupid stuff while I was young.” He still today will not rule out the possibility of making war on the United States and using bombs to blow up buildings. Today, he won’t do that. And yet, Barack Obama launched his campaign at [William Ayer's] house. Good God almighty in his seat in heaven, how much more evidence do you need before you question the people standing around Barack Obama.”

    The Political Republican Opinion agrees with Glenn Beck. One of the key components that can be used to determine the character of a man, is his associations and utilization of judgement. What if Barack Obama had been a casual friend of Osama Bin Laden? Would this make you question his judgement? Would you still be accepting of his stock-in-trade line, “that’s not the Osama Bin Laden that I knew!”? If so, you are one of the hopeless, mindless throng that worships at the feet of the new political messiah. You cannot be helped; your lot in life is set. You will always be a follower and easily guided by the empty promises of those that see you as easy prey.

    For those with a brain - those who have the capability to judge a man by his deeds and not his words, the only conclusion can be that Barack Obama is, indeed, a scary man. How one could ever turn the most powerful position in the world over to a man with such questionable character is beyond me!

    Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , ,

  • 27Aug

    Political Republican Opinion video - NoBama GirlThe Political Rebublican Opinion found this video on YouTube. In it, The NoBama Girl sings the truth about Barack Hussein Obama and sports the NoBama T-shirt.

    The NoBama Girl, clearly, must also be a racist!

    Duration : 0:3:45

    Continue reading »

    Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , ,

  • 26Aug

    The Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Bill Clinton Steps In It Again! You just gotta love Bill Clinton! Just one day before he is set to speak at the Democratic National Convention, ole Bill comes out with this gem: “Suppose for example you’re a voter. And you’ve got candidate X and candidate Y. Candidate X agrees with you on everything, but you don’t think that person can deliver on anything. Candidate Y disagrees with you on half the issues, but you believe that on the other half, the candidate will be able to deliver. For whom would you vote?”

    After getting the astonished looks he surely was expecting, the former President added, “This has nothing to do with what’s going on now.” Sure it doesn’t, Bill.

    Hillary has no choice but to fall in line with the Democratic Party if she has any hope at all of becoming President some day in the future. She would, of course, rather have that day come sooner than later. Anything short of a last second Obombashell would mean that her next chance wouldn’t occur for at least four more years – and that’s only if Obama loses!

    It would seem that the Clintons may have decided that their best course of action is to have Hillary toe the party line while Bill does the dirty work. They need for Barack Obama to lose so that Hillary doesn’t lose eight years worth of potential momentum.

    You really have to give it to the Clintons; even when they are down, they are never really out. Even when they appear to be out, they always have a foot in the door, scraping something off their shoes.

    See the full story at The Hill.

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • 26Aug

    The Political Republican Opinion : Political Saitire

    Modern Agenda Press Corps Dateline: November 3, 2036

    Political Republican - Campaign Finance Reform

    Megamultibillionaire I. M. Pecunious, CEO and President of GetItAll Corp, the world’s richest corporation, has backed yet another winner. “That’s five in a row. We can’t be stopped!” the jubilant Pecunious proclaimed.

    Thunderous applause erupted during new United States President-elect Rutherford Ulysses Worthy’s acceptance speech, as he thanked the megamultibillionaire and other key backers of the Power Party, stating, “without the billions raised by Mr. Pecunious and many of the other prominent members of W.E.A.L.T.H., I never could have done it.” R.U. Worthy continued, “As President, I will continue to make sure that those Americans who have worked hard, have studied hard and have actually earned the money they deserve, keep it. The American Dream is possible and it’s time to live it or be left behind!”

    W.E.A.L.T.H. (Where Elite Americans Lead The Helpless), the political interest group formed twenty-five years ago when limits on individual contributions to political parties were eliminated, has been backing the Power Party since its inception. Its members include some of the wealthiest people in the world, individuals who have benefitted from the Power Party’s uniform tax rate, which was adopted five years after the party began their political winning streak. The ultra-conservative group’s slogan “Strive, fight or deserve your plight” echoed throughout the hall during newly-elected President R.U. Worthy’s victory celebration.

    The Power Party was formed in 2009 after disgruntled conservatives became fed up with the moderation of the Republican Party. Based on a platform of lower corporate taxes, a uniform tax rate for all Americans, the right to bear arms and a strong national defense, the party has reversed the downward spiral of the U.S. dollar, lifting the U.S. economy out of the deep recession that threatened to bring the country to its knees and back to a position of economic world prominence.

    Global opinion of the United States has never been lower, however, as all economic support has been halted for countries abroad. Opponents of the ultra-conservative movement point to the alarming increase in poverty and crime in this country as direct results of the Power Party’s platform. They have continually pointed out that the disparity in political spending leaves them at a major disadvantage.

    Defeated Democratic Presidential hopeful, Manny R. Indigent, thanked his supporters in a concession speech, stating “I don’t know how this party of the people, this last light of hope for the impoverished will ever stand a chance unless something is done about political campaign finance reform. We cannot compete in an environment that allows the voice of the wealthy to be heard shouted from the rooftops of the corporate-owned media while the whispers of the oppressed are muffled by rags in the sewers of our streets. We must not tolerate a system that allows one party to transport their supporters to the polls in luxury transportation en-masse while we are left with no other option than to use dilapidated buses, travelling over pot-hole-riddled streets into war-zone neighborhoods where the residents are fearful to even leave their homes.”

    “This cannot possibly be what the framers of our Constitution had intended when they promised all Americans the right to participate in the electoral process.” Delegate Indigent continued, “That promise has been broken and it is up to us to fix it. I will continue to do battle for those who cannot fight for themselves, for those who can barely put food on their tables, for those who believe that they matter, too. It’s time, however, for those that have the will, for those who know how to fight, for those who are strong, to join me in A New Revolution. I thank the Power Party for giving us the right to bear arms, for eliminating background checks, for allowing those of us with resolve to take this country back!”

    As fires burn in the streets and shots ring out through the night in cities across America, current President, Wiley B. Praetorian, has promised full National Guard support for the cities hardest hit by the early stages of revolt. One can only wonder what the real results of this latest Presidential election will be.

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    Tags: , ,

  • 24Aug
    Uncategorized No Comments

    The Political Republic Opinion:

    The Political Republican feels that Barack Obama’s pick of Joe Biden as his Vice Presidential running mate could not be a more perfect match. Biden will have no choice but to join Senator Obama, continuing Obama’s policy of abruptly changing his political stances. Consider the following videos:

    This video shows Senator Biden’s lack of confidence in Barack Obama’s experience, while he endorses John McCain:



    The Political Republican can only wonder how Joe Biden will squirm his way out of these racially insensitive remarks?:



    Finally, The Political Republican offers this funny parody video, expressing how Joe Biden and Chris Dodd must have felt after getting hammered by Obama in the Iowa caucuses. Joe Biden must undergo a complete attitude change if the fictitious views in this video are any barometer of his true feelings:



    Senators Biden and Obama have differing opinions on many political issues:

    • Biden voted for the war in Iraq, calling Saddam Hussein “an extreme danger to the world.” Even after no weapons of mass destruction were found, Biden continued to support the Iraq war, saying, “I still believe that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction and that the war in Iraq was justified.” Obama said that Saddam Hussein posed “no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors.”

    • Joe Biden agreed with Senator John McCain on “the surge,” stating, “I’ve believed for a long time, a view shared by my Republican colleague John McCain and many others as well, that we need more force in Iraq. That’s not a popular position to take. But we need more force now in order to have less force later. We need to gain control of security in Iraq.” Barack Obama refuses to this day to admit that the surge was the right decision.

    • Senator Biden is vehement in his stance against off-shore drilling for oil. In July, he called Republican efforts to allow off-shore drilling “a last-ditch effort to go out and rape the offshore continental shelf, so that they own it and are able to use it as leverage in the future.” Barack Obama has recently said that he would support a new energy policy that included off-shore drilling (although he left enough wiggle room for an elephant to squirm out of it).

    The one thing that the new Democratic ticket has in common, is their far-left political views. There are not two more Liberal politicians in the U.S. Senate than Barack Obama and Joe Biden. How they will spin their political differences will be interesting to watch. The Political Republican can hardly wait for the flip-flopping to begin!

     

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • 23Aug

    Become a Guest Writer on the Political Republican Opinion bogHow would you like to offer your own Republican perspective on the events of today on one of Google’s top rated Conservative opinion blogs? The Political Republican Opinion blog is now accepting articles from guest writers who would like to offer their own unique Republican perspective.

    To become a guest writer, simply submit your content in the Contact Us section of The Political Republican Opinion blog (the tab is at the top of the page). Put the name that you would like to use as your “Guest Writer” credit, a title at the top and the content below it.

    I would recommend writing the article in an editor like WordPad or Microsoft Word first, then copying and pasting it into the “Message” window on the Political Republican Opinion Contact Us page. I’ve already tested it; the “Message” window will accept some pretty massive posts!

    Please try to make articles between 300 and 500 words (although shorter or longer pieces will not automatically be declined). Also, don’t be offended if The Political Republican Opinion blog does a little editing of your piece (I hate grammatical errors and misspellings); but, be assured that any minor “tweaking” will not alter the content in any way.

    Also, (this should go without saying) please keep article submissions consistent with the intention of this site, which is to give views of the political world from a Republican perspective.

    Finally, please don’t worry; I have far better things to do with my life than collect E-Mail addresses. You will never be spammed, your E-Mail address will never be sold or given to any other entity and, other than to notify you that your article has been accepted and is now posted on The Political Republican Opinion blog, you will never hear from me again! (Unless, of course, you have questions or otherwise E-Mail me for some feedback.)

    I look forward to your submissions to The Political Republican Opinion blog and happy writing!

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Tags: ,

  • 22Aug

    The Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Empty Wallet The oil companies are showing their largest profits ever this year and it has become a major issue in many political campaigns. As part of their “Big Corporation Bad, Little Abused Citizen Good” theme, the Democratic party has been playing on the knee-jerk reactions of many who have not taken the time to do the math. By promising things like a windfall profit tax on “Big Oil,” many Democrats are praying upon the ignorant public’s need to lash out and make someone responsible for the higher prices that they are paying at the pump. The Political Republican would like to set the record straight and do the math for those who have not taken the time to think before they react. In order to make this explanation as simple to follow as possible, The Political Republican will use just the simplest of numbers:

    Let’s pretend that the federal government decides that “punishing” the oil companies with a windfall profits tax is not enough. Instead, they will take over the industry completely and nationalize it, much like the way that countries like Venezuela have done.

    Let’s also assume for this purpose, that gas is $4.00/gallon. Instead of using the average oil industry’s net profit margin of 8%, we’ll inflate it and say that oil companies are making a 10% profit on the price being charged for gasoline. In a nationalized industry, we’ll assume that the government-run oil industry gives away all of the profits to the poor American consumer. In this scenario, the American public would save a whopping 40¢ per gallon on their gas. Holy smokes, that would take the price of gasoline almost halfway down to the price that it was before the Democrat majority Congress took office two years ago with promises of lowering the price of fuel. I can’t help but wonder if properly inflating our tires, would save that much!

    The scenario is, of course, absurd because we all know that the federal government would never give back the entire 40¢; they would have to take a piece of it for a pet project or ten. The Political Republican hopes this shows that, no matter what size the windfall profit tax would be, that it would hardly make a major impact on the ever-straining pocketbooks of Americans.

    So what are the reasons that we are seeing this incredible jump in gasoline prices? The answer is really quite simple. The United States is at the mercy of the rest of the world for our oil. The OPEC cartel in the Middle East is practicing a new brand of economic terrorism by refusing to pump more oil out of the ground. Because demand is higher than their artificially created lower supply, they can ask whatever they want for oil and get it.

    To further compound the problem, because the United States is pumping so much money into foreign markets, we are continually increasing our trade deficit and weakening the American dollar. The world economy is based upon the U.S. dollar so, the weaker the dollar gets, the more dollars it takes to buy things abroad … things like oil!

    The answer is so clear, that even the majority of Democratic voters are saying they want to open up further exploration and drilling for oil in The United States and off the country’s coastlines. This would increase the supply of oil in the world market and decrease the amount of dollars that America is sending to foreign markets. We would control supply and the value of our own dollar.

    Environmentalists scream that the answer is to rid ourselves of oil dependence entirely. This is a pipe dream that will never happen. There will never be an electric airplane; we will never be able to replace plastics (imagine how heavy a car would be and how poor the gas mileage would be if there was no plastic in a car); women will not decide to go without makeup; we will always need lubricants for our machinery (including cars); the list goes on …

    We are always going to be just one incident, just one Middle East conflict away from a worldwide oil crisis. The fact that oil prices rose $5.00 per barrel yesterday just because of speculation involving U.S. – Russia tensions should give reasonable people cause for alarm.

    The Political Republican is all for a revived effort to provide new energy sources such as wind power, solar power, electric cars and nuclear power. The less oil we use, the further the price will go down and the higher the American dollar will climb. Energy independence will keep us immune from the spikes that could arise from wars and terrorist incidents, as well. The answer is simple … drill more of our own oil and decrease our dependence on it at the same time.

    Big Oil Bad? … Bad Government Worse! Tell The Political Republican what you think!

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • 19Aug

    The Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - NoBama T-shirt My wife told me not to wear it. She’s always so concerned about offending people, whereas I seem to thrive on it (why she puts up with me, I’ll never know).

    We were getting ready to go out to the karaoke bar down the road from us and I decided to wear my NoBama T-shirt. I like to be relaxed when I sing karaoke and prefer to don a T-shirt and jeans versus the “star” wannabe outfits you see some of the karaokites wear. I know … at this point, you’re thinking to yourself two things … “a conservative who sings karaoke?” and “c’mon, ‘karaokite’ isn’t really a word, is it?”

    First, you’d be surprised at how many karaoke singers are political Republicans. I’d say that well over half of the people I know that sing karaoke are. Secondly, “karaokite” is a word if enough people care to repeat the word I just invented! I digress …

    So, for a change, I won the “discussion” with my wife (probably because it was my birthday) and off to the karaoke bar we went. Immediately upon entering the bar, people started noticing the NoBama T-shirt. Just so you know, out of respect for the ears of the public at large, I only go out and sing karaoke in public once or twice a year; therefore, nobody in the place knew us. The bartender took our drink orders and said she loved the shirt. I shot my wife one of those “see, I told you so” looks as she rolled her eyes. Soon it was time to sing a song.

    There were whistles and clapping as I took the stage to sing my first song, “Yoko Ono” by The Barenaked Ladies. Whistles and clapping are nothing new to karaoke bars as it is common practice to cheer even the worst of singers, so I thought nothing of it. After all, it takes a lot of guts to risk public humiliation on a stage in front of a throng of total strangers. I got through the song without butchering it too badly and then it began … “No Bama, No Bama, No Bama, No Bama.” The chant started at one table and soon spread throughout the entire bar. I gave two thumbs up, a nod and left the stage to return to the table and my wife.

    Needless to say, we had quite a few complete strangers come down to sit and talk with us that night. Everybody wanted to know where I got the shirt and to, of course, talk politics. It’s amazing; but, even when drunk, political Republicans make far more sense than the soberest of liberal Democrats. Every time my name was called to return to the karaoke stage, the chant started up all over again … “No Bama, No Bama, No Bama, No Bama.”

    We had the best night I can ever remember having at a karaoke bar. When we jumped into the car to head back home, my wife looked at me and said, “I can’t believe nobody came up and said something nasty about that shirt.” Having had a few extra birthday drinks, I looked at her, snorted and said, “Liberals are all pussies; they’d never have the balls!” (What can I say, I may be a political Republican, but I don’t necessarily toe the line of political correctness.) She shook her head, frowned and rolled her eyes once again.

    The purpose of this article is threefold, I guess. Number one: Always marry an angel; she’ll put up with far more of your crap than you deserve. Number Two: Get an Obama T-Shirt; you’ll be surprised by how many people you meet who think just the way that you do and how many who don’t that are too cowardly to say anything at all. And, Number Three: use the word “karaokite” as often as you can until it catches on; if nothing else, my epitaph may someday read, “Here lies a man who invented an utterly ridiculous word.”

    The NoBama T-shirt

    What better way to show that you are a political republican than with this T-Shirt? This heavyweight, 100% cotton preshrunk T-shirt is available in small through 4XL sizes.

    Click Here to get yours today!

    Technorati Tags: , , , ,

    Tags: , , , ,

  • 19Aug

    The Political Republican Opinion:

    Political Republican Opinion - Eliminating English Due to recent comments by Barack Obama, that Americans need to learn to speak Spanish, I could think of no more appropriate time to break out an article that I had previously written that was looking for a home. Political republicans everywhere will be pulling their hair out over this one …

    At last, I’ve heard it all. The Oregon Department of Forestry is now enforcing a law, enacted in 2003, that requires firefighting crew leaders to speak the languages of each member of their crew. The Department of Forestry’s Jim Walker states that “85% of the crew makeup is of Spanish descent.” Because of this, if even one member of a firefighting crew cannot speak English, a crew boss is required to learn Spanish.

    The enforcement of this rule means that many crew leaders are being demoted to squad bosses, who are responsible for fewer firefighters, thus, receiving less pay. In worst case scenarios, when no English speaking firefighters make up a crew, the crew leaders are losing their jobs altogether.

    The state has said that the safety of the firefighters is the reason for the law. They are concerned that crew leaders may not be able to communicate quickly to Spanish speaking firefighters if a fire were to make a sudden turn or if other dangers immediately threaten the crew. “Our main concern is that they are safe, and they are in a safe environment, and a lot of that deals with communication,” Walker said.

    Manuel Franco, a contractor for firefighting crews, believes the rule is necessary for firefighter safety as well, stating “I think the (rule) is good, because that’s for safety purpose.” When asked if the rule was fair to crew chiefs who only speak English, he added “We’re living here. We should speak the language.”

    Amen! Leave it to the ultra-liberal, tree-hugging state of Oregon to come up with a law that promotes the dilution of English as this country’s national language. State officials claim the law became necessary when the wildfires of 2002 brought in a huge influx of immigrant workers to help fight the infernos. Another massive breakout of fires across the Southwestern United States in 2006 forced the state of Oregon to scramble for any workers they could get and, therefore, enforce the laws, enacted three years earlier.

    Asked why the crew bosses were being required to learn Spanish, rather than the firefighters having to learn English, Jim Walker stated “If it comes down to a safety issue, and [having them learn English is] the only way we can have people safely on an incident, then yes [we would be forced to hire English speaking firefighters].” The implication here is that it is far easier to fire one guy, than to hire a whole crew. I imagine it may be less expensive to hire non-English speaking firefighters as well.

    I can only wonder if it is not putting the firefighters at greater risk, however, when their most experienced members are being demoted or let go. The public may very well be at risk if they, too, cannot understand the directions being given to them by firefighters who cannot communicate in English.

    What’s next? Will state police chiefs be required to learn new languages if Oregon faces a crime wave, due to looting, that “forces” them to hire non-English speaking officers. Imagine if Oregon’s hospital chiefs of staff were required to speak Farsi, Hindi, Japanese, Arabic, Chinese, and Spanish if the fires create more casualties than the current English speaking staff can manage. If this is happening in Oregon, a state with only an 8% Spanish speaking population, one can only wonder what will happen in states like California, where the percentage of minorities is far higher.

    Where is this kowtowing to minorities going to end? Isn’t it enough that I have to struggle to find English written on the boxes of products that I purchase and then wrestle with foreign-written assembly instructions that an eight year old could write more clearly? Isn’t it outrageous enough, that the telephone operator at many companies cannot transfer my call correctly because she cannot communicate in English effectively? Isn’t it frustrating enough, that I have to speak to someone in Pakistan or India when I have a problem with my computer? When will minorities realize that they are being held down by school systems that set up separate classes for their non-English speaking children?

    This is the United States of America. Our official language is English and English only. Generations of immigrants have come to this country, worked hard to learn the language and prospered because of it. Our “Pledge of Allegiance” states that we are one nation, (under God), indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Immigrants are at liberty to learn the language, or be left with the least-paying and most undesirable jobs. There is no justice when tenured, hard-working Americans are losing their jobs so that we can accommodate those that are too lazy or apathetic to become part of this one nation.

    Political Republicans, it is time to stop this nonsense; enough is enough! If Presidential candidates really want to bring this country together, they can start with unifying us under one language. They can work toward prohibiting states from enacting such divisive laws. Until we are able to communicate clearly with one another, there is no hope at all for unity. Let’s begin there first. Then, maybe, we’ll be able to tackle the larger issues that confront this country.

    Technorati Tags:

    Tags:

  • 19Aug

    The Political Republican:

    Political Republican Opinion - SombrerObama Political Republicans are up in arms everywhere over this one! After commenting on how embarrassed he is about Americans’ inability to speak foreign languages when they visit Europe, Barack Obama made the outlandish statement that Americans need to make sure that their children learn to speak Spanish.

    No, he didn’t say that children needed to learn to speak French or German, places visited far more frequently than Spain by Americans who travel to Europe; he specifically stated “Spanish.” Could Barack Obama be more blatant in his pandering for the Hispanic American vote? Unfortunately, he used the expression that pisses English speaking Americans off more than any other when they try to converse with Hispanic Americans who refuse to learn English - “Choo need to learn to espeak espanish!.” While Obama may gain a few Latino votes, he very well may have lost far more votes of English speaking Americans that live in areas where they are beginning to feel like foreigners in their own country.

    No, I don’t need to learn to speak your language. The fact that I have learned to speak enough Spanish to converse Tarzan-like to those that are too lazy to learn the language spoken in this country was my choice, just as it was the choice of Spanish-only speaking citizens(?) to severely limit their employment and social opportunities by segregating themselves from the American public at large.

    The Political Republican has a question … Does Barack Obama speak Spanish? Of course not! The only language besides English that he speaks is Bahasa, the official national language of Indonesia, a country also known for having one of the highest concentrations of Muslims in the world. Interesting, too, that Indonesia has a national language but Obama does not advocate the United States having one, isn’t it?

    Apparently Barack Obama is already delivering on his promise of CHANGE. Since being chosen as the Democratic Party’s nominee, Obama has CHANGED his position on gun control, welfare reform, NAFTA, the war in Iraq and now, apparently, drilling for oil off the coast of the United States. I probably shouldn’t get too rattled by Obama’s latest proclamation about our need to learn Spanish, however. When his handlers process the polling data and see that they actually lost votes, I’m sure his position on this, too will CHANGE. The Political Republican can hardly wait to see how he spins out of this one!

    Technorati Tags: , , ,

    Tags: , , ,

  • 19Aug

    The Political Republican:

    Political Republican Opinion - Democratic Espionage The Obama campaign made it official on Friday, announcing that there will be a state-by-state roll call during the Democratic Party National Convention. The decision to have a floor vote is a move that the Obama campaign hopes will appease the many Hillary Clinton supporters who have, thus far, refused to back Obama in his bid for the White House.

    According to politico.com, Representative Loretta Sanchez says she’s “happy for the chance to vote for Hillary Clinton,” adding that she believes that as many as half of the Democrats in the house could join her. Rep. Sanchez went on to say, “I felt [Hillary Clinton] was the most experienced and the best candidate and I still feel that way.” According to the same article, former delegate counter Matt Seyfang sees potential drawbacks to the roll call, stating, “putting her name in the nomination, you’re putting people on the spot,” adding that it also chews up a significant amount of broadcast time.

    Any Political Republican has got to be thinking that John McCain may be the luckiest man to ever run for President. No matter how this thing goes, it’s a lose-lose situation. Too much support for Hillary weakens Barack Obama; too little support throws salt in the already open wounds of Senator Clinton’s loyal supporters. It’s almost as if the Republicans have an insider in the Democratic Party that is sabotaging the party every step of the way. Let’s review:

    The “Party of the People” decided to “punish” Florida and Michigan, two very large delegate states, for holding their primaries early – a move that angered voters in both states so much, that many have pledged their votes to John McCain in the General Election. Being a Florida resident myself, I couldn’t even count the number of registered Democratic voters that I heard, who asked for a Republican ballot in the voting room during the Primaries. John McCain clearly received his first cross-over votes, which may have had a huge impact on his Florida win. Mitt Romney and Rudi Giuliani dropped out soon thereafter. I have yet, to meet a Florida Political Republican who says that they voted for McCain.

    To compound their Democratic Primary problems, the Democratic Party decided to get cute and play with the electoral system. Rather than do the sensible thing, which would have been to have a winner take all system like the Republicans have, they decided to be “different” and have delegates assigned as a percentage of each state’s popular vote. This dragged on the primary process for so long, that their main opponent, John McCain, was afforded the opportunity to concentrate his efforts on raising money and visiting the smaller towns that politicians frequently never make it to. Furthermore, it created a rift in the Democratic Party that may not be soon mended. If they would have counted delegates the way that Republicans do, and the way that they will be counted in the General Election, the race wouldn’t have been close. Hillary would have won easily (and that’s without counting either Florida or Michigan – states where she won!).

    Finally, they created the absolutely absurd concept of the “Super Delegate” – a way of rewarding Democratic Party loyalists and dignitaries with special votes that could, in this case, overturn the popular vote. The Political Republican can only wonder when the Democrats will learn that the Presidential Election is not won by popular vote. Didn’t Al Gore’s loss teach them anything? I would suggest that they re-read the section of the U.S. Constitution that outlines the Electoral College process. They might even learn a thing or two like the right to bear arms and freedom of religion in the process!

    The Political Republican has to wonder if the Democratic Party can possibly do anything else to try to throw the Presidential election? Apparently the answer is “yes.”

    Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

    Tags: , , , , ,

  • 18Aug

    The Political Republican:

    Political Republican Opinion - Obamacrat Since 1932, when Franklin D. Roosevelt announced his “New Deal,” the Democratic Party has stood for redistribution of power and wealth from “big business” to the workers. It signaled the beginning of the Democratic Party’s liberal agenda, which included government control of the economy, control of prices, the expansion of welfare programs and the increased importance of unions. Amongst other social issues, the modern Democratic Party has added to their platform, environmentalism, abortion rights, embryonic stem cell research, a national government health care system, a higher minimum wage and a progressive tax system that places higher tax burdens on those that earn more money.

    After The Political Republican has waded through all of the hope and change rhetoric, Senator Obama’s positions are really no different than the rest of the Democratic Party. One only has to look at his voting record to see this. When he has bothered to vote (he has missed more than 38% of the votes during the current congressional session), Barack Obama has voted with the rest of the Democratic Party nearly 97% of the time. For a candidate promoting change from the “politics of the old,” and “new hope” for the citizens of this country, Senator Obama has done little but to toe the party line.

    Barack Obama has differed from his party’s positions on just one significant vote. In that one, he voted against a bill that provided funding to the troops for the war in Iraq, increased funding for hurricane relief to Gulf Coast residents, provided funding for increased port and mass transit security as well as increased funding for children’s health care, mine safety research and youth violence protection activities. This vote, to be sure, is in direct contrast to the views of the Democratic Party. Ironically, the majority of the programs that were to receive funding are ones that he purports to support.

    One of the significant votes that Barack Obama skipped was a bill that implemented recommendations by the 9/11 commission for changes to the Homeland Security Act. Specifically, this bill included provisions for the inspection of all cargo traveling on passenger aircraft as well as grants to improve the ability of first responders to react to and prevent terrorist attacks. One can only wonder why Senator Obama did not feel the need to vote on these issues, considered crucial in the country’s efforts to thwart terrorism.

    The Political Republican believes that, like a monster from a mass murderer movie, Hillary Clinton will never really be “dead” until she is put in the ground after the new President’s inauguration. There is very little difference between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in terms of their voting records. Like Senator Obama, Hillary also has voted along Democratic Party lines 97% of the time. She was one of only nine other Democrats to vote “no” to the same bill that Obama did. In addition, she also opposed the Democratic majority position when she voted against providing tax breaks to oil and gas companies for providing innovative ways of reducing our dependence on foreign oil. The main difference is, that Hillary isn’t pretending to be anything other than a Democrat. She has made no false proclamations of being part of a new political order.

    John McCain, on the other hand, appears to be the candidate most capable of bipartisanism. He deviated from the Republican Party’s position on bills 12% of the time. On bills of significance, he made waves in the Republican Party by voting for embryonic stem cell research and for voting for tighter border security with a “path to citizenship” for illegal aliens. He has, in fact, been labeled by many political republicans as a “maverick” for his unwillingness to toe the party line on several key issues.

    Clearly, Barack Obama’s track record differs from his message of new hope and new politics. According to the “National Journal,” Senator Obama was the most liberal member of Congress in 2007. This is hardly in line with his rhetoric and shows that he is just another Democrat with a nice smile and a lot of empty words. If the country is truly seeking the candidate that is most likely to get things done; if we really want a President that can get Congress to work together, it seems clear to The Political Republican that the Republican candidate is offering the only hope in that direction. John McCain … who knew?

    Technorati Tags: , , , , ,